Tahir Hussain convicted in 2020 Delhi riots: BJP demands AAP apology

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Tahir Hussain convicted in 2020 Delhi riots: BJP demands AAP apology

Synopsis

A Delhi court's conviction of former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain for the murder of IB officer Ankit Sharma in the 2020 northeast Delhi riots has reignited one of India's most politically charged post-riot trials. With the BJP demanding a public apology from the AAP and opposition parties divided in their response, the verdict lands at the intersection of law, communal politics, and electoral accountability.

Key Takeaways

Karkardooma Court convicted former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain on 14 July for the murder of IB officer Ankit Sharma during the 2020 northeast Delhi riots .
Four other accused — Javed , Anas , Nazim , and Kasim — were also convicted; six others were acquitted.
BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal demanded that the AAP apologise to the people of Delhi over the verdict.
BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia questioned Congress leader Imran Masood's remarks defending Hussain and targeted Sonia Gandhi and Arvind Kejriwal .
Samajwadi Party spokesperson Ashutosh Verma urged restraint, noting that the convicted parties may still appeal to a higher court.

A Delhi court on Tuesday, 14 July convicted former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain and four others for the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer Ankit Sharma during the 2020 northeast Delhi riots, triggering sharp political reactions from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which demanded a public apology from the AAP to the people of Delhi.

The Verdict

The Karkardooma Court found Hussain — who was suspended by the AAP after his name surfaced in the case — guilty on multiple charges including promoting enmity, rioting, assault, use of criminal force, and murder. Four other accused, Javed, Anas, Nazim, and Kasim, were also convicted in connection with the case. The court, however, acquitted six other accused persons, holding that the prosecution had failed to establish their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

BJP's Reaction: 'AAP Must Apologise'

BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal said the verdict exposed the AAP's alleged complicity in the violence. 'This clearly shows that the riots were pre-planned and were supported by the Aam Aadmi Party. The party did not take any action against its MLA. Now that the truth has come to light, the Aam Aadmi Party should apologise to the people of Delhi. Those found guilty should receive the punishment prescribed under the law,' Khandelwal said.

BJP National Spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia extended the attack to both the AAP and the Indian National Congress (INC), questioning remarks made by Congress leader Imran Masood, who had reportedly claimed that Hussain was being targeted because of his religion. 'Imran Masood also made a statement that Tahir Hussain is being targeted just because he is a Muslim. Was this statement made at the direction of Rahul Gandhi? Did Rahul Gandhi hold Imran Masood's ear and tell him to apologise?..' Bhatia said.

Bhatia also questioned Congress leader Sonia Gandhi and former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, accusing both of siding with the accused rather than the victim's family. 'The big question that both Arvind Kejriwal and Sonia Gandhi should answer is this: when the law does its work, the police does its work, and our IB officer does his work, why is it that Sonia Gandhi and Arvind Kejriwal engage in dirty and low-level politics? They do politics on dead bodies like vultures and do not stand with the victim's family. Instead, they stand with the accused, because they see the accused's religion as their vote bank…' he said.

Samajwadi Party Urges Restraint

Samajwadi Party spokesperson Ashutosh Verma called for the verdict to be respected while noting that legal avenues remained open to the convicted. 'I believe the court's verdict should be respected. However, they still have the opportunity to pursue legal remedies. The Constitution allows them to approach a higher court and fight their case. Until the judicial process is fully concluded and a final verdict is delivered, it would not be appropriate to comment further on the matter,' Verma said.

Background: The 2020 Northeast Delhi Riots

The 2020 northeast Delhi riots broke out in February 2020 amid protests over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), leaving more than 50 people dead and hundreds injured. IB officer Ankit Sharma was among those killed, and his family had alleged that Hussain's residence was the site from which the attack was orchestrated. Hussain was subsequently suspended by the AAP and later joined another political formation. The case has remained one of the most politically charged trials to emerge from the riots. With sentencing yet to be pronounced, the legal process in the case is ongoing.

Point of View

But the political fallout is already being shaped more by electoral calculus than by accountability. The BJP's demand for an AAP apology conflates a court verdict against an individual — who was suspended by the party — with institutional culpability, a leap the evidence does not yet support. Equally, the Congress's framing of the prosecution as religiously motivated, before the full judicial process concluded, undermines the credibility of opposition voices on rule-of-law issues. The Samajwadi Party's measured response stands out precisely because it is the exception. What the verdict does confirm is that the 2020 riots remain a live political fault line, one that no party has fully reckoned with.
NationPress
14 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Tahir Hussain and what was he convicted for?
Tahir Hussain is a former councillor of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) who was convicted by the Karkardooma Court on 14 July for the murder of Intelligence Bureau officer Ankit Sharma during the 2020 northeast Delhi riots. He was found guilty on charges including promoting enmity, rioting, assault, use of criminal force, and murder. Hussain had been suspended by the AAP after his name surfaced in the case.
What did the Delhi court decide in the 2020 riots murder case?
The Karkardooma Court convicted Tahir Hussain and four others — Javed, Anas, Nazim, and Kasim — for the murder of IB officer Ankit Sharma. Six other accused were acquitted as the prosecution could not establish their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Sentencing is yet to be pronounced.
Why is the BJP demanding an apology from the AAP?
BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal alleged that the 2020 Delhi riots were pre-planned and supported by the AAP, and that the party failed to act against those involved. Following Hussain's conviction, the BJP argued that the AAP owes the people of Delhi an apology for its alleged association with the accused.
What is the Congress's position on the Tahir Hussain verdict?
Congress leader Imran Masood had reportedly claimed that Hussain was being targeted because of his religion, a remark the BJP cited as evidence of the Congress shielding the accused on communal grounds. BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia questioned whether the remark was made at the direction of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi.
Can Tahir Hussain appeal the conviction?
Yes. Samajwadi Party spokesperson Ashutosh Verma noted that the Constitution allows the convicted to approach a higher court. The verdict from the Karkardooma Court is a trial court decision and can be challenged before the Delhi High Court and, subsequently, the Supreme Court.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 28 min ago
  2. 1 hour ago
  3. 19 hours ago
  4. 21 hours ago
  5. 21 hours ago
  6. 6 days ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google