Why Is the Bail Hearing for Gaganpreet Kaur Delayed Until September 24?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The bail hearing for Gaganpreet Kaur has been delayed.
- Police have not recovered key evidence yet.
- The case involves serious charges including culpable homicide.
- The accident resulted in a tragic loss of life.
- The importance of road safety is underscored by this incident.
New Delhi, Sep 20 (NationPress) A Delhi court has postponed the bail hearing for Gaganpreet Kaur, the primary suspect in the Delhi BMW accident case, until September 24. This decision was made after the police argued that they have not yet secured her mobile phone and driving licence.
Judicial Magistrate Ankit Garg was informed by the investigators that they oppose granting her bail at this moment, as the investigation is still in its early stages.
In contesting Kaur's plea, the police asserted that her mobile phone, which she used to reach out to family after the incident, represents a vital piece of evidence.
“We have not yet retrieved the mobile phone and driving licence from the accused,” stated the prosecution lawyer.
The defence counsel clarified that Kaur's phone is currently with her husband and would be returned to the police by Saturday evening.
He added that Kaur's driving licence had been previously handed over to investigators, but if it remains unrecorded, the family is prepared to submit it again.
Kaur was arrested following the tragic death of Navjot Singh, a Deputy Secretary in the Ministry of Finance, and the serious injuries sustained by his wife, Sandeep Kaur, in an accident that occurred on September 14 near Dhaula Kuan.
The tragic incident took place around 1 P.M. on September 14, close to the Delhi Cantt Metro Station. The victim couple was returning from Bangla Sahib Gurdwara on a motorcycle when a BMW car, allegedly driven by Gaganpreet Kaur, struck them. Her husband, Parikshit, was in the passenger seat during the collision.
In an additional development, the court has issued a notice to the police regarding a separate request from the accused for the preservation of CCTV footage from the accident scene.
On Thursday, the court noted that there is no legal framework permitting the sharing of CCTV footage with defendants in a criminal matter.
Following the incident, the police have filed charges under several legal provisions, including culpable homicide not amounting to murder, as well as rash and negligent driving. There is also an ongoing investigation into potential evidence tampering.