Delhi Police denies detention claim over food taken to Jantar Mantar

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi Police denies detention claim over food taken to Jantar Mantar

Synopsis

A viral X post alleging Delhi Police detained three boys for carrying food to Jantar Mantar was flatly denied by the DCP South East District on 24 July. Police say the vehicle was stopped for routine ID verification — and the driver left on his own before officers even knew the food was headed to a protest site.

Key Takeaways

Delhi Police on 24 July called a viral social media claim ‘false and misleading’ after it alleged three boys were detained at Nizamuddin Police Station for carrying food to Jantar Mantar .
The DCP, South East District issued an official clarification on X , directly rebutting the allegation.
Police said the vehicle was stopped for routine identity verification at a checkpost — not because of the food or its destination.
The driver left the spot with the vehicle while ID checks were ongoing; officers say they were unaware the food was for protestors until after the driver had gone.
The force described the claim as ‘baseless and malicious’ and said it misrepresents a standard verification procedure.

Delhi Police on 24 July categorically dismissed as “false and misleading” a viral social media claim alleging that three young boys were detained at Nizamuddin Police Station for carrying food to Jantar Mantar. The clarification was issued by the Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), South East District, in direct response to a post circulating on X.

What the Viral Claim Alleged

An X user alleged that “three young boys have been detained by the Delhi Police at Nizamuddin Police Station for carrying food to Jantar Mantar,” adding that “several reports of young kids being detained for no reason” had emerged. The post spread rapidly, drawing public attention and criticism directed at the police.

What Delhi Police Said

The DCP, South East Delhi, responded directly on X, stating: “The claim of boys being detained at Nizamuddin Police station for carrying food to Jantar Mantar is FALSE and MISLEADING.” An official written clarification followed, outlining the sequence of events in detail.

According to the police statement, “police personnel did not stop or prevent any individual from carrying food items.” The vehicle was intercepted as part of a routine picket/checkpost duty solely to verify the identity of the occupants and confirm their origin and destination, the clarification noted.

How the Incident Unfolded

Delhi Police said that while identity verification was underway, the driver of the vehicle left the spot along with the vehicle and its contents — a detail the force cited to counter claims of deliberate interference. The occupants subsequently disclosed that the food was destined for a protest site. Notably, the driver had been arranged by a friend of one of the occupants and was not personally known to them.

The force added that “till the time the driver left, the deployed staff were not even aware that the food was meant for protestors,” underscoring that no targeted action was taken against the individuals on account of their destination.

Police Characterise Claim as Malicious

The official statement concluded that personnel “were performing routine picket checking and verification duty as mandated,” and that the allegation “appears intended to misrepresent a standard verification procedure.” The force described the claim as “baseless and malicious.”

The episode highlights the speed at which unverified social media claims about police conduct can escalate, particularly during periods of active protests at Jantar Mantar. As of the time of reporting, no formal complaint had been filed by the individuals involved, according to the police clarification.

Point of View

But it raises a question mainstream coverage is glossing over: why did the driver leave mid-verification, and why did the occupants not know their own driver? The police account, if accurate, is plausible — routine checkposts near protest sites are standard practice. But the fact that a single unverified post triggered a formal DCP-level clarification reflects how rapidly social media can force institutional responses, regardless of factual basis. The deeper issue is the information environment around Jantar Mantar protests, where trust deficits on both sides make even mundane police interactions flashpoints.
NationPress
24 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Delhi Police detain boys for carrying food to Jantar Mantar?
Delhi Police have denied this, calling the claim false and misleading. According to the official clarification issued by the DCP South East District on 24 July, no individual was stopped or prevented from carrying food items; the vehicle was intercepted only for routine identity verification.
What actually happened at the Nizamuddin checkpost?
Police say the vehicle was stopped at a routine picket for identity verification of the occupants. While checks were ongoing, the driver left the spot with the vehicle. Officers said they were not aware the food was meant for a protest site until the occupants disclosed this after the driver had already left.
Who issued the official denial and where?
The clarification was issued by the Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South East District, Delhi Police. The DCP also posted a direct rebuttal on X in response to the viral allegation.
Why does this incident matter?
It illustrates how rapidly unverified claims about police conduct during protests can spread on social media, prompting senior officers to issue formal rebuttals. The episode reflects broader trust tensions around policing of protest sites like Jantar Mantar.
Was any formal complaint filed by the individuals involved?
According to the Delhi Police clarification, no formal complaint had been filed by the individuals at the time the statement was issued.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 2 days ago
  3. 3 days ago
  4. 3 days ago
  5. 3 days ago
  6. 3 days ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 9 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google