Is there a double standard in how dissent is treated in BJP versus Congress?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
On June 2, Congress leader Udit Raj drew attention to the contrasting attitudes towards dissent within the BJP and Congress. His insights reveal a deeper conversation about party loyalty and political accountability, particularly when power shifts. This article explores these dynamics and their implications within Indian politics.
Key Takeaways
- BJP leaders often remain silent about their grievances.
- Congress leaders tend to voice concerns publicly when out of power.
- Udit Raj criticized those who speak out against the party post-tenure.
- Party loyalty and accountability are vital for effective leadership.
- Dissent within political parties should be welcomed, not suppressed.
New Delhi, June 2 (NationPress) Congress leader Udit Raj on Monday highlighted a significant disparity between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress party regarding leaders voicing their concerns and dissent against their own leadership.
Udit Raj, in an interview with IANS, remarked: “Numerous senior BJP leaders, including founding figures like LK Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi, refrain from publicly criticizing the party. They remain silent even when sidelined. Conversely, within the Congress party, many leaders become vocal and restless when the party loses power.”
“Those who held ministerial positions during Congress governments for a decade start to voice criticism against the party. This is particularly surprising as they weren't even founding members,” he added.
He also noted that the party high command shares the sentiment that those leaders unable to secure booth wins in elections are nonetheless granted significant positions within the party.
His comments are perceived as a pointed critique of Salman Khurshid, who was the External Affairs Minister during the Congress-led UPA administration.
Earlier in the day, Khurshid, who was part of an all-party delegation, reacted to a wave of criticism from his constituency, stating it was disheartening to witness “people back home calculating political allegiances,” which seemed directed at critics within the Congress.
Khurshid's recent support for the abrogation of Article 370 by Prime Minister Modi's government and its favorable effects in the region attracted praise from the BJP and muted criticism from the Congress.
Historically, the Congress has opposed the revocation of Jammu and Kashmir's special status; however, its stance has recently appeared more ambiguous.
Udit Raj also criticized the depiction of dissent within the Congress as a sign of increasing factionalism, citing dissenters within the BJP who openly voice their opinions without the same label of ‘conflict’ being applied.
“Subramanian Swamy has publicly claimed that five Indian fighter jets were shot down by the Pakistani Army. Why is the BJP silent on this matter? Why isn’t this perceived as a division within the party?” he questioned.
Point of View
Udit Raj's remarks shed light on the contrasting dynamics of dissent within political parties. His observations prompt a reflection on accountability and the nature of party loyalty in Indian politics. It is vital for parties to foster an environment where constructive criticism is welcomed, ensuring that leadership remains responsive and accountable to its members.
NationPress
08/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Udit Raj say about dissent in BJP and Congress?
Udit Raj highlighted that while BJP leaders, including founding members, remain silent about their grievances, Congress leaders tend to voice their concerns more openly when the party is out of power.
Who is Salman Khurshid?
Salman Khurshid is a senior Congress leader who served as the External Affairs Minister during the UPA government. He recently faced criticism for his comments regarding the abrogation of Article 370.
What is Article 370?
Article 370 was a provision in the Indian Constitution that granted special autonomy to the region of Jammu and Kashmir. Its abrogation by the Modi government has been a controversial political issue.
Why is dissent seen differently in BJP and Congress?
Udit Raj argues that while dissent within the BJP is largely ignored, similar expressions of concern within Congress are often labeled as factionalism or internal conflict.
What implications do Udit Raj's comments have for Indian politics?
His comments suggest a need for greater accountability and openness within political parties, encouraging leaders to express dissent constructively rather than suppressing it.
