Did ECI Issue a Notice to Congress Leader Pawan Khera’s Wife Over Her ‘Two Voter IDs’?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Election Commission of India has issued a notice to Kota Neelima, spouse of Congress leader Pawan Khera, regarding allegations of possessing two active voter IDs. This notice has sparked significant political debate, raising questions about electoral integrity and responsibility in India's political landscape.
Key Takeaways
- The ECI has issued a notice regarding dual voter IDs.
- This action is based on allegations against Kota Neelima.
- Two active EPICs can lead to legal consequences.
- The deadline for response is September 10.
- The situation has stirred political controversy.
New Delhi, Sep 4 (NationPress) The Election Commission of India (ECI) issued a notice on Thursday to Kota Neelima, the wife of Congress leader Pawan Khera, requesting a response by September 10. This action arises from allegations that she possesses two active EPICs—one registered in Delhi and another in Telangana.
The notice was sent to Neelima’s residence in Kaka Nagar, Delhi, and was issued by the Election Registration Officer (ERO) of the New Delhi Assembly constituency.
The notice states, “As you may know, being registered on the electoral roll of more than one constituency is a criminal offense under the Representation of the People Act, 1950.
“You are therefore directed to explain why action should not be initiated against you under the relevant Act,” it further noted.
The ERO has requested that Neelima’s response should reach their office by 11 a.m. on September 10 (Wednesday).
This notice was issued to Neelima under Form 7/Rule 20 (3) (b) of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. The ERO also shared the two distinct entries from the electoral rolls of both states that illustrate her separate registrations.
The poll panel’s action coincides with the BJP's ongoing criticism of the Congress party regarding the 'voter theft campaign.'
Following the revelation of Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera's two voter IDs, the BJP has now focused its attention on his wife, who also allegedly holds “two active EPICS.”
BJP leader and IT cell chief Amit Malviya took to social media platform X to highlight that Kota Neelima, who contested from the Khairatabad segment in Telangana, possesses two active EPICs—one in Khairatabad and the other in New Delhi.
Malviya shared details of the two voter IDs: EPIC Number: TDZ2666014, Assembly: 60-Khairatabad, active until 2023 and 2025; EPIC Number: SJE0755975, Assembly: 40-New Delhi.
He also questioned Rahul Gandhi's silence on this issue, stating, “Rahul Gandhi held a press conference and without proper due diligence, targeted and jeopardized honest voters by revealing their identities without consent. He doxxed young professionals and daily laborers seeking better opportunities,” he remarked on X.
Point of View
This incident underscores the critical importance of electoral integrity in a democratic society. While the allegations against Kota Neelima warrant investigation, they also highlight the broader issue of voter registration practices in India. Ensuring that all citizens are registered correctly is vital for upholding the democratic process. The ECI's action aligns with its mandate to maintain a fair electoral environment, and it remains to be seen how political parties will respond to these challenges.
NationPress
04/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the reason behind the ECI's notice to Kota Neelima?
The ECI issued a notice due to allegations that Kota Neelima holds two active EPICs—one in Delhi and another in Telangana, which is a violation of the Representation of the People Act, 1950.
What are the consequences of holding two voter IDs?
Holding two voter IDs is considered a penal offense under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and can lead to legal action against the individual.
When is the deadline for Kota Neelima to respond to the notice?
Kota Neelima is required to submit her response to the ECI by 11 a.m. on September 10.
How has the BJP responded to this situation?
The BJP has criticized the Congress party over the issue, linking it to their 'voter theft campaign' and highlighting the allegations against both Pawan Khera and his wife.
What is the significance of this notice in the political landscape?
This notice raises questions about electoral integrity, accountability, and the responsibilities of political leaders regarding voter registration.
