Why is further clarification needed on the Aravalli Hills definition?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Supreme Court's recent decision to suspend its previous directives on the Aravalli Hills definition raises critical questions about environmental protection and sustainable mining practices. As new expert committees are considered, the implications for the ecologically fragile region are significant, reflecting a broader concern for conservation amidst development pressures.
Key Takeaways
- The Supreme Court has put a hold on its revised definition of the Aravalli Hills.
- A new expert committee may be constituted to assess previous recommendations.
- Mining activities in the region are currently suspended.
- Ecological integrity and sustainability are key concerns.
- Protests against mining have raised awareness about environmental issues.
New Delhi, Dec 29 (NationPress) The Supreme Court has placed its previous directives regarding a revised definition of the Aravalli Hills on hold. The three-judge Bench, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant, noted that there has been a misinterpretation of the expert committee's report and the court’s comments, necessitating additional clarifications before implementing any recommendations.
This Bench, which also includes Justices J.K. Maheshwari and A.G. Masih, has issued a notice regarding the suo motu writ petition titled “Definition of Aravalli Hills and Ranges and Ancillary Issues,” with a return date set for January 21.
The Supreme Court ordered, “We find it essential that the committee's recommendations and the court's directives be suspended. This stay will remain until the (new) committee is established.”
The CJI's Bench is considering forming a new high-powered expert committee to comprehensively evaluate the recommendations from previous panels concerning the definition of the Aravalli range.
The newly proposed committee will investigate whether regulated mining is permissible in the 500-meter gaps between hills and, if allowed, what structural parameters are necessary to maintain ecological continuity.
The apex court emphasized the need to determine if the 100-meter elevation criterion is scientifically valid and if a detailed geological assessment is required.
During the hearing, Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta informed the Bench that instructions have already been issued to halt all mining activities in the Aravalli states.
Additionally, the Centre’s senior law officer clarified that measures are in place to prevent the issuance of new mining licenses in the Aravalli region.
The Supreme Court also sought the assistance of Attorney General R. Venkataramani and senior advocate P.S. Parmeswar regarding the composition of the new expert committee.
Following the Supreme Court's ruling on November 20, which classified only landforms with an elevation of 100 meters or more as Aravalli hills, concerns were raised about the protection of this ecologically sensitive range.
In response to protests across several districts of Rajasthan, including Udaipur, Jodhpur, Sikar, and Alwar, against the approval of mining activities in the Aravalli mountain range, the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change imposed a comprehensive ban on new mining leases throughout the Aravalli landscape. The ministry has tasked the Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE) with identifying additional no-mining zones and devising a robust Management Plan for Sustainable Mining for the entire range.
Point of View
It is crucial to observe that the Supreme Court's decision to reconsider the definition of the Aravalli Hills reflects a necessary pause for introspection and expert evaluation. This approach not only highlights the importance of sustainable practices but also ensures that the ecological integrity of the region is preserved for future generations. The dialogue surrounding the Aravalli range must remain a priority for both policymakers and environmentalists.
NationPress
08/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding the Aravalli Hills?
The Supreme Court suspended its earlier directives on the revised definition of the Aravalli Hills, citing the need for further clarification and assessment.
Why is a new expert committee being considered?
The court believes a new expert committee is essential to holistically evaluate previous recommendations and ensure ecological continuity in the Aravalli range.
What implications does this decision have for mining activities?
The suspension of the definition raises questions about existing and future mining activities in the Aravalli region, affecting regulations and licenses.
What areas are covered under the Aravalli range?
The Aravalli range spans several districts in Rajasthan, including Udaipur, Jodhpur, Sikar, and Alwar.
What environmental concerns are associated with mining in the Aravalli Hills?
Mining activities pose significant risks to the ecological balance, including habitat destruction and potential loss of biodiversity.
