Gujarat saints demand Pappu Yadav's expulsion over Parliament protest on Sanatan Dharma

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Gujarat saints demand Pappu Yadav's expulsion over Parliament protest on Sanatan Dharma

Synopsis

Gujarat's Sanatan Sant Samaj has launched a statewide memorandum drive demanding Independent MP Pappu Yadav's expulsion from Parliament after he wore saffron robes to stage a symbolic skit on alleged Ram Temple donation theft — a move the saints call a deliberate insult to Sanatan Dharma. With effigy-burning programmes threatened and a petition headed for the President, the agitation is set to escalate.

Key Takeaways

The Sanatan Sant Samaj submitted a memorandum to Ahmedabad District Collector Bhavya Verma on 4 August demanding legal action against Independent MP Pappu Yadav .
The demand follows a 31 July protest inside the Parliament complex where Yadav wore saffron robes to enact a skit on alleged Ram Temple, Ayodhya donation embezzlement.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and other Opposition MPs participated in the demonstration; Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Akhilesh Yadav were also named by protesters.
The Lok Sabha Secretariat has since barred costume-based and theatrical protests inside the Parliament complex.
The organisation plans to petition President Droupadi Murmu via the district administration and Governor Acharya Devvrat , and may organise effigy-burning protests if demands go unmet.
Similar memorandums are being submitted across Gujarat districts as part of a declared nationwide campaign.

Hindu saints under the banner of the Sanatan Sant Samaj on 4 August submitted a memorandum to Ahmedabad District Collector Bhavya Verma, demanding legal action against Independent MP Pappu Yadav and the cancellation of his parliamentary membership. The delegation alleged that a protest staged inside the Parliament complex on 31 July insulted Sanatan Dharma, the saffron robe, and the saint community at large.

What Triggered the Agitation

The controversy stems from a demonstration inside the Parliament complex on 31 July, in which Pappu Yadav dressed in saffron robes and enacted a symbolic skit over alleged embezzlement of donations made at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. Opposition MPs, including Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, participated by placing money into donation boxes while Yadav, portraying a priest, pocketed the money to symbolise the alleged theft. The demonstration was part of the Opposition's broader demand for a parliamentary discussion on the alleged donation irregularities.

The Lok Sabha Secretariat subsequently indicated that costume-based protests and theatrical demonstrations would not be permitted inside the Parliament complex going forward.

What the Saints Said

Addressing the media outside the Collector's office, one of the saints said the Parliament protest had deeply hurt religious sentiments. “All saints and mahants from across Gujarat are present here today. The act committed in Parliament has hurt religious faith. It is highly condemnable and has brought disgrace to the saint community. Most importantly, it concerns the faith associated with Lord Ram. We have come together to submit a memorandum demanding that the MP's membership be cancelled and that immediate and the strictest possible action be taken,” he said.

Another speaker alleged that Pappu Yadav had ‘worn the attire of a fake saint’ and claimed the protest had been carried out with the support of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, Rahul Gandhi, and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav. “I will continue to fight until Pappu Yadav is expelled from Parliament and prevented from contesting elections again,” he added.

On the underlying Ayodhya donation case, a saint distinguished the alleged criminal matter from the Parliament demonstration. “Whatever happened in Ayodhya has caused us immense pain, just as it has every Hindu. Those accused have already been jailed and a Special Investigation Team is investigating the matter,” he noted, arguing that the political protest was a separate and more offensive act.

Statewide Campaign and Next Steps

The Sanatan Sant Samaj said similar memorandums were being submitted across Gujarat districts as part of a nationwide campaign. The memorandum is intended to be forwarded to President Droupadi Murmu through the district administration. The organisation also announced plans to seek an appointment with Governor Acharya Devvrat and, if its demands are not addressed, to organise further demonstrations — including the burning of effigies — in the coming days.

Broader Political Context

The episode reflects deepening friction between the Opposition's parliamentary protest tactics and religious sentiment mobilised by Hindu organisations. This is not the first time a symbolic demonstration inside Parliament has drawn backlash; the Lok Sabha Secretariat's swift directive against costume-based protests signals institutional discomfort with theatrics inside the complex. Critics argue the agitation is politically motivated, while the saint community maintains the protest crossed a line by appropriating religious symbols for partisan ends.

Point of View

The saints are careful to separate their anger at the Parliament skit from the underlying Ayodhya donation case, which they acknowledge is already before an SIT. That distinction matters: it shifts the frame from defending alleged wrongdoers to defending a religious symbol, which is politically far safer ground. The Lok Sabha Secretariat's rapid ban on costume protests suggests the institution itself was uncomfortable, inadvertently lending legitimacy to the saints' grievance. Whether this translates into durable pressure on Yadav — or fades after the effigy-burning cycle — depends on whether the BJP formally endorses the campaign rather than letting religious bodies carry it alone.
NationPress
4 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are Gujarat saints demanding action against Pappu Yadav?
The Sanatan Sant Samaj alleges that Independent MP Pappu Yadav insulted Sanatan Dharma and the saint community by wearing saffron robes inside the Parliament complex on 31 July to enact a symbolic skit about alleged donation theft at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The saints say the use of saffron attire for a political demonstration is deeply offensive to their faith and identity.
What exactly happened during the Parliament protest on 31 July?
Pappu Yadav dressed in saffron robes and staged a symbolic skit in which he, portraying a priest, pocketed money from donation boxes while Opposition MPs including Rahul Gandhi placed money in them — representing the alleged embezzlement of Ram Temple donations. It was part of the Opposition's demand for a parliamentary discussion on the Ayodhya donation controversy.
What action has the Lok Sabha Secretariat taken?
The Lok Sabha Secretariat indicated after the 31 July demonstration that costume-based protests and theatrical performances would not be permitted inside the Parliament complex. No further disciplinary action against Pappu Yadav has been publicly confirmed.
Who is the memorandum addressed to and what does it demand?
The memorandum was submitted to Ahmedabad District Collector Bhavya Verma and is intended to be forwarded to President Droupadi Murmu. It demands legal action against Pappu Yadav and the cancellation of his parliamentary membership. The organisation also plans to submit a representation to Gujarat Governor Acharya Devvrat.
What further protests has the Sanatan Sant Samaj announced?
The organisation has announced it will seek an appointment with the Governor and, if its demands are not met, will organise additional demonstrations including effigy-burning protests. It has also declared further programmes in the coming days as part of a nationwide campaign, with memorandums being submitted across Gujarat districts.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. Yesterday
  3. 3 days ago
  4. 3 days ago
  5. 4 days ago
  6. 4 days ago
  7. 4 days ago
  8. 4 days ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google