Is Yathindra Siddaramaiah Interfering in Governance?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Shivamogga (Karnataka), Jan 30 (NationPress) In light of the speculations surrounding the involvement of Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's son, Congress MLC Yathindra Siddaramaiah, in administrative matters, Deputy Chief Minister and State Congress President D.K. Shivakumar has firmly stated that Yathindra is not interfering in governance.
During a media briefing at the Shivamogga Circuit House on Thursday, Shivakumar addressed allegations made by BJP MLA Sunil Kumar, who suggested that Energy Minister K.J. George was preparing to resign due to Yathindra's alleged involvement. Shivakumar remarked, “I am unaware of such developments. Minister George is a seasoned official who works with integrity. I learned of this through media reports, and one cannot consider everything the opposition claims as factual.”
Shivakumar further explained that when party members submit requests, they may occasionally reach out to officials for assistance. “What is wrong with advocating for the welfare of our workers? I receive requests from various departments and engage with each one. There is no evidence of interference in administration, and I have not observed him meddling in such matters.”
In response to rumors about Yathindra’s interference leading to George's resignation, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah confirmed that George had not resigned.
Legal Advisor and Congress MLA A.S. Ponnanna emphasized the collaboration between Minister George and Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, stating, “These reports are untrue. Minister George is an asset to our Chief Minister. An IAS officer’s absence from a meeting was due to a prior engagement, not a disregard for the Chief Minister.”
Minister George himself clarified, “Is it that simple for a minister to resign? Yathindra Siddaramaiah has no influence over my department. He is a commendable individual and a promising leader.”
On the other hand, former minister and veteran BJP leader M.P. Renukacharya accused Yathindra of meddling across various departments. “No one dares to speak out about this situation. An audio recording had previously circulated. Ministers are disillusioned. If Chief Minister Siddaramaiah were to resign, it appears a scheme is in place to elevate his son, Yathindra, to the role of Deputy Chief Minister. Yathindra seems to control the entire government,” he asserted.
Earlier, Minister George had reassured that everything was functioning well under Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s leadership, denying any plans to resign.
During a Karnataka Assembly session, Minister George responded to concerns raised by BJP MLA V. Sunil Kumar following the Question Hour.
Deputy Chief Minister Shivakumar also addressed inquiries regarding the delay in Apex Bank elections, stating, “The elections have not been postponed; no nominations have been submitted. The party will determine the next steps.”
Regarding claims of Rs 400 crore missing in Belagavi, allegedly Congress funds, Shivakumar stated, “The opposition has the CBI; let them investigate. We are unclear whose funds are involved. Baseless accusations only lead to mockery.”
On local body elections, Shivakumar stated, “We are committed to conducting these elections. A court hearing regarding reservations is imminent. We have encouraged panchayat leaders to prepare. The State Election Commission is also gearing up and intends to use ballot papers. The finalization of the schedule is pending. To uphold the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, we are determined to hold elections for panchayats and municipalities.”
When asked about supporters calling for him to become Chief Minister at various events, he remarked, “I believe such discussions are premature; time will reveal the outcome. I am fulfilling the responsibilities entrusted to me by the party.”
On efforts to ascend to the Chief Minister position, he responded, “This government owes its existence to the dedication of our party workers, who are our backbone.”
Regarding the authority of corporation and board members, he stated, “The appointment order indicated ‘for two years or until further orders’. We will assess when further directives are provided.”