Kejriwal demands PM explain whereabouts of four named individuals
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Four names. One pointed question directed at the Prime Minister. AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal on Saturday, 10 October 2026, publicly demanded that the Prime Minister account for the whereabouts of Abhijit Deepke, Ashutosh Ranka, Dhruv Rathi, and Saurab Das, alleging that police have been used to detain or disappear them from public view.
Posting in Hindi on X, Kejriwal wrote: 'प्रधान मंत्री जी, अभिजीत दीपके, आशुतोष रांका, ध्रुव राठी और सौरब दास कहाँ हैं? आपने पुलिस के ज़रिए उन्हें कहाँ रखा है? देश जानना चाहता है।' — translated: 'Prime Minister, where are Abhijit Deepke, Ashutosh Ranka, Dhruv Rathi, and Saurab Das? Where have you kept them through the police? The country wants to know.'The four names Kejriwal is asking about
The post names four individuals — Abhijit Deepke, Ashutosh Ranka, Dhruv Rathi, and Saurab Das — and directly implicates police as the instrument of their alleged detention or disappearance. Kejriwal does not elaborate on the circumstances, but the framing — 'where have you kept them' — implies they are being held without public knowledge or due process.
No official government response or police statement was available at the time of this report. NationPress could not independently verify the current status or whereabouts of the individuals named.
A direct challenge to the Prime Minister
By addressing the Prime Minister personally and invoking the phrase 'देश जानना चाहता है' ('the country wants to know'), Kejriwal frames the question as a matter of national public interest rather than a private legal dispute. The rhetorical device is deliberate: it shifts the burden of explanation squarely onto the Union government and its law-enforcement machinery.
The post carries no supporting documents, no FIR numbers, and no dates of alleged detention — details that would be essential to independently assess the claim. What it does carry is the full political weight of a former Chief Minister and sitting national party convenor making a named, specific allegation in a public forum.
If the individuals named are indeed being held without transparent legal process, the post could trigger demands for habeas corpus proceedings or parliamentary questions. If they are not, the government has both the standing and the incentive to respond swiftly with facts. Either way, silence from the authorities now only amplifies the question Kejriwal has put on the record.