Kejriwal says criminal case filed against him for seeking PM's degree
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A question about a university degree has landed AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal in a Gujarat court — and he is not letting the country forget it. On Tuesday, 18 August 2026, Kejriwal posted on X, stating that when he asked for Prime Minister Narendra Modi's academic degree, a criminal case was filed against him, and that trial is now proceeding in a court in Gujarat.
In his post, Kejriwal wrote: 'मैंने प्रधान मंत्री जी की डिग्री माँगी तो इन लोगों ने मुझ पे क्रिमिनल केस कर दिया। गुजरात की एक अदालत में मेरे ख़िलाफ़ मुक़दमा चल रहा है।' — translated: 'When I asked for the Prime Minister's degree, these people filed a criminal case against me. A case is being tried against me in a court in Gujarat.'
The degree dispute that refuses to close
The controversy over Prime Minister Modi's academic qualifications has been a recurring flashpoint in Indian politics for over a decade. Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party have previously sought documents through Right to Information applications and public campaigns, demanding transparency about the PM's educational credentials. The Gujarat criminal case, as Kejriwal describes it, stems directly from that demand.
Kejriwal's framing is pointed: that asking a constitutional question — the educational record of a sitting Prime Minister — should not invite prosecution. His post does not specify the exact charges or the complainant, but the political message is unmistakable. He is positioning the case as an example of state power being used to silence political scrutiny.
Gujarat court, national stakes
The fact that the trial is being heard in Gujarat — the Prime Minister's home state — adds a layer of political symbolism that Kejriwal is clearly leaning into. For AAP, which has built its identity around demanding accountability from those in power, the case fits a long-running narrative about the cost of asking inconvenient questions.
Kejriwal himself has faced multiple legal battles in recent years, including a high-profile arrest in 2024 in connection with the Delhi liquor policy case, from which he later secured bail. His supporters argue these cases are politically motivated; the ruling establishment contests that characterisation. The Gujarat degree case now joins that broader contested terrain.
Whether a court vindicates him or not, Kejriwal has ensured the question stays alive: in a democracy, what happens when a citizen — or a politician — simply asks for proof?