Gujarat Dy CM Sanghavi slams Kejriwal after fake IB call arrests in Vadodara

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Gujarat Dy CM Sanghavi slams Kejriwal after fake IB call arrests in Vadodara

Synopsis

What began as AAP's allegation of police harassment has unravelled into a criminal case against the party's own Vadodara unit chief. Gujarat police say the 'IB officer' who allegedly threatened an AAP worker was actually a labour contractor acting on orders from within the party — turning Kejriwal's public accusation into a political liability.

Key Takeaways

Gujarat Deputy CM Harsh Sanghavi accused Arvind Kejriwal of fabricating allegations against Gujarat Police on 31 May .
Ashok Oza , President of AAP's Vadodara city unit, and labour contractor Nitin Dobariya were arrested by Anand Cyber Crime Police .
Police allege Dobariya called AAP worker Keshavji Chauhan posing as an IB officer from the 'Karelibaug IB Office' to intimidate him.
Investigators alleged the incident stemmed from internal rivalry within AAP , with Oza allegedly targeting a political competitor.
The case was triggered by an X post on 28 May by former Delhi MLA Durgesh Pathak , later amplified by Kejriwal.
A case is registered under BNS Sections 61(2), 204, 351(1) and IT Act Section 66-D ; investigation is ongoing.

Gujarat Deputy Chief Minister Harsh Sanghavi on Saturday, 31 May launched a sharp attack on Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Convenor Arvind Kejriwal, accusing him of fabricating allegations against the state police after an investigation into a purported Intelligence Bureau (IB) verification call led to the arrest of two men — including Ashok Oza, President of AAP's Vadodara city unit. The case, registered at Anand Cyber Crime Police Station, has turned a political controversy into a criminal matter, with investigators alleging the entire episode was rooted in internal rivalry within the AAP.

How the controversy unfolded

The sequence of events began on 28 May, when former Delhi MLA and AAP leader Durgesh Pathak posted on social media platform X alleging that Gujarat Police's IB wing was threatening AAP workers. Kejriwal subsequently amplified the claim, stating he had personally dialled the number in question and that the individual who answered identified himself as an IB officer. Kejriwal publicly questioned under what authority such verification calls were being made and urged other recipients to come forward.

What the investigation found

Following the social media posts, Anand district police traced the mobile number cited in the allegations to a resident of the district. Investigators identified the caller as Nitin Dobariya, a labour contractor originally from Rajkot district, and alleged that the call had been orchestrated by Ashok Oza. According to police, a call was made from Dobariya's phone to AAP worker Keshavji Chauhan, during which the caller falsely claimed to be speaking from the 'Karelibaug IB Office' and allegedly threatened him under the guise of a verification exercise. Investigators further alleged the call was motivated by internal political rivalry — Oza allegedly viewed Chauhan, who had been assigned organisational work in Vadodara, as a rival and sought to intimidate him into leaving the city.

Sanghavi's political counter-attack

Deputy CM Sanghavi did not limit his response to the legal findings. 'The number you called belongs to your own man. Why are you building a bundle of lies by portraying him as an IB officer?' he said, addressing Kejriwal directly. He escalated further: 'World records are broken by the best. In fraud, in lies, in fakeness, Kejriwal stands undefeated.' Sanghavi added, 'What can one expect from a party whose very foundation rests on lies? This is the character of Kejriwal and his associates — tell lies, tell them loudly and tell them repeatedly.' He closed with a pointed warning: 'But Kejriwal ji, this is Gujarat. Here you will have to face the truth.'

Legal sections invoked

A case has been registered under Sections 61(2), 204, and 351(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act — provisions covering criminal intimidation, impersonation, and cheating by personation through electronic communication. Police confirmed that further investigation is ongoing.

What happens next

With the AAP yet to formally respond to the arrest of its Vadodara unit chief, the episode is likely to sharpen political tensions in Gujarat ahead of future electoral cycles. The ongoing investigation may surface additional details about the alleged internal dynamics within the party's state unit, adding a new dimension to what began as a political allegation against the state's law-enforcement machinery.

Point of View

Or chose to weaponise without knowing the full picture.
NationPress
6 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Gujarat fake IB call case about?
The case involves an alleged phone call made to AAP worker Keshavji Chauhan in which the caller falsely claimed to be an IB officer from the 'Karelibaug IB Office' and threatened him. Police arrested AAP's Vadodara city unit chief Ashok Oza and labour contractor Nitin Dobariya, alleging the call was planned to intimidate a political rival within the party.
Who has been arrested in connection with the fake IB call?
Anand Cyber Crime Police arrested two individuals: Ashok Oza, President of AAP's Vadodara city unit, and Nitin Dobariya, a labour contractor from Rajkot district. Police allege Dobariya made the call while Oza orchestrated it.
What did Arvind Kejriwal allege, and how did it backfire?
Kejriwal claimed he personally called the number in question and that the person who answered identified himself as an IB officer, suggesting Gujarat Police were harassing AAP workers. The subsequent investigation, however, traced the number to a man allegedly linked to AAP's own local leadership, prompting Deputy CM Sanghavi to accuse Kejriwal of spreading deliberate falsehoods.
What legal charges have been filed in the case?
A case has been registered at Anand Cyber Crime Police Station under Sections 61(2), 204, and 351(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 66-D of the Information Technology Act, covering criminal intimidation, impersonation, and cheating by personation through electronic means. The investigation is ongoing.
How did the controversy start?
The controversy began on 28 May when former Delhi MLA and AAP leader Durgesh Pathak posted on X alleging Gujarat Police's IB wing was threatening AAP workers. Kejriwal subsequently amplified the allegation, which prompted Anand district police to trace and investigate the mobile number cited in the posts.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google