Kejriwal Questions IB Over Calls to AAP Workers in Gujarat

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kejriwal Questions IB Over Calls to AAP Workers in Gujarat

Synopsis

AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal says he personally called a number allegedly used to contact AAP workers in Gujarat, where the caller identified as IB personnel before hanging up. He has demanded the IB clarify its legal authority for such calls and vowed to visit the IB office in Gujarat himself.

Key Takeaways

Kejriwal claims he called a number that had been contacting AAP workers in Gujarat and the person who answered identified themselves as being from the Intelligence Bureau .
When Kejriwal asked under which law inter-state workers must be verified by the IB, the caller disconnected and did not pick up again.
Kejriwal has publicly demanded the IB confirm whether the number belongs to them and clarify the legal basis for such verification calls.
He has directed AAP workers in Gujarat to post any future such calls on social media for public scrutiny.
Kejriwal announced he will personally visit the IB office in Gujarat on his next trip to the state to seek answers.
AAP has a history since 2014 of alleging misuse of central agencies against its leaders and workers.

AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday, 28 May 2026, publicly challenged the Intelligence Bureau (IB) after claiming he personally called a number that had allegedly been contacting AAP workers in Gujarat and that the person who answered identified themselves as being from the IB. Kejriwal said he asked under which law a citizen travelling from one state to another for work is required to get verified by the IB — and that the call was disconnected without an answer.

What Kejriwal Said

Posting in Hindi, Kejriwal described the episode as 'bahut sangeen mamla' ('a very serious matter'). He wrote that after calling the number himself and confirming the person claimed to be from the IB, he introduced himself as Arvind Kejriwal and asked: 'Aap kis qaanoon mein verification kar rahe ho?' ('Under which law are you conducting this verification?'). He said the caller immediately hung up and has not picked up since.

Kejriwal urged all his followers to call the number themselves and ask the same question. He also called on IB to publicly clarify whether the number belongs to them, and announced that on his next visit to Gujarat he would personally go to the IB office to seek answers.

He further directed AAP workers in Gujarat to post on social media the next time they receive such a call, so the public can also ask questions directly.

Context: AAP's Recurring Complaints Against Central Agencies

This is not the first time AAP has raised concerns about the conduct of central agencies toward its cadre. Since 2014, the party has publicly alleged that central investigative and intelligence agencies have been used to target its leaders and workers. AAP governs Delhi and Punjab, both of which share a frequently adversarial relationship with the BJP-led central government.

In Gujarat — a BJP stronghold — AAP maintains a small but active organisational presence, including networks among inter-state migrant workers. Complaints about surveillance or verification calls to political workers in the state have surfaced before without any formal clarification from the Ministry of Home Affairs.

Policy Backdrop: Legal Limits of IB Verification

The Intelligence Bureau operates under the Ministry of Home Affairs and is India's primary domestic intelligence agency. Its mandate covers internal security, but there is no publicly codified statute that requires citizens travelling between states for employment to register with or be verified by the IB. The legal basis — if any — for such calls to ordinary workers or political volunteers has never been formally explained by the government.

Indian opposition parties have repeatedly raised concerns about the accountability of central intelligence agencies, particularly regarding activities that cross state boundaries and appear to target political opponents. These concerns have rarely been addressed through official channels.

Stakeholders and Impact

AAP's Gujarat unit workers and inter-state migrant labourers are the most directly affected. If the calls are genuine IB activity, they raise serious questions about the legal authority under which such verification is being conducted. If the calls are not from the IB, the matter becomes one of impersonation of a central agency — itself a criminal offence.

The episode also has implications for centre-state relations, a fault line that has widened considerably between AAP-governed states and the central government in recent years.

What's Next

Kejriwal has put the Ministry of Home Affairs and the IB on notice, demanding a public clarification on whether the number in question belongs to the agency and under what legal framework such verifications are conducted. A formal response — or the absence of one — will likely determine whether AAP escalates the matter in Parliament or through legal channels. Kejriwal's stated intention to visit the IB office in Gujarat in person adds a direct confrontational dimension that will be closely watched.

Point of View

He converts an internal party grievance into a civic accountability question that is difficult for the government to ignore without appearing evasive. The demand for IB to confirm or deny ownership of the number puts the agency in an uncomfortable position: confirmation would invite scrutiny of its legal authority, while silence would fuel the opposition narrative of unchecked agency overreach. This fits a broader AAP pattern of using social media confrontation to force institutional responses on centre-state friction points. With the party already governing two states, the episode is also a mobilisation signal to its Gujarat cadre ahead of any future electoral cycle in the state.
NationPress
13 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Kejriwal claim about the IB call to AAP workers in Gujarat?
Kejriwal claimed that AAP workers in Gujarat have been receiving calls from a number where the caller identifies as being from the Intelligence Bureau and asks them to undergo verification. He said he personally called the number, confirmed the caller claimed to be from the IB, asked under which law such verification is required, and the caller hung up immediately.
Is it legal for the IB to call citizens for verification when they travel between states for work?
There is no publicly codified law that requires citizens travelling between Indian states for employment to register with or be verified by the Intelligence Bureau. The legal basis for such calls has never been formally clarified by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
What action has Kejriwal announced against the IB?
Kejriwal has demanded the IB publicly clarify whether the phone number in question belongs to them. He has also announced that on his next visit to Gujarat he will personally go to the IB office to ask for answers, and has urged AAP workers to post any future such calls on social media.
What is AAP's history with central intelligence and investigative agencies?
Since 2014, AAP has repeatedly and publicly alleged that central investigative and intelligence agencies have been deployed against its leaders and workers for political reasons. The party governs Delhi and Punjab and has a consistently adversarial relationship with the BJP-led central government on issues of federal autonomy.
Why does this matter for inter-state migrant workers in Gujarat?
If central agency personnel are calling ordinary citizens — including migrant workers — to conduct verification without a clear legal mandate, it raises serious civil liberties concerns. AAP's Gujarat networks include inter-state migrant communities, making the issue relevant beyond just political workers.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 8 hours ago
  2. 15 hours ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google