Kerala PSC exam irregularities: Vigilance probe into Planning Board recruitment

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kerala PSC exam irregularities: Vigilance probe into Planning Board recruitment

Synopsis

Kerala's Public Service Commission is under fire after examiners allegedly skipped evaluating answers to 10 questions in a senior Planning Board recruitment exam — and the PSC still published rank lists and made appointments. Now the state government is weighing a VACB probe, but faces a constitutional puzzle: can a vigilance body investigate a constitutionally established commission?

Key Takeaways

The Kerala government is considering transferring the investigation into PSC exam evaluation lapses to the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) .
Examiners allegedly failed to evaluate answers to 10 questions in candidate scripts for three Chief-level posts in the State Planning Board .
Despite the error, the PSC published rank lists for two posts and appointed two candidates ; over 200 candidates had appeared.
The Home Department is seeking legal opinion on constitutional hurdles to probing the PSC, a constitutional body.
A final decision is expected at the next State Cabinet meeting.
The probe may expand to cover recruitment for KAS , DSP (Special Recruitment) , Assistant Professor in Law Colleges , and other posts.

The Kerala government is actively considering handing over the investigation into alleged irregularities in a Public Service Commission (PSC) recruitment examination for senior posts in the State Planning Board to the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB), amid escalating criticism over the PSC's handling of the controversy. The development, reported on 5 July, marks a significant escalation in the state's response to what critics have called a compromised internal inquiry.

Background: What Went Wrong in the Evaluation

The controversy centres on a PSC recruitment examination conducted for three Chief-level posts in the State Planning Board. During the evaluation process, examiners allegedly failed to assess answers to ten questions in the answer scripts of candidates — a lapse that went undetected before results were processed. More than 200 candidates had appeared for the examination.

Despite the error, the PSC proceeded to publish rank lists for two of the three posts and went ahead with the appointment of two candidates. The irregularity came to light only after a complaint was filed before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal. During tribunal proceedings, the PSC admitted that mistakes had occurred in the evaluation process.

Why the Internal Probe Has Lost Credibility

Following the tribunal's intervention, the PSC announced that all answer scripts would be re-evaluated and rank lists revised accordingly. However, candidates have since complained that no concrete steps have been initiated to carry out the promised re-evaluation, deepening distrust in the process.

Critics have specifically questioned the fairness of the ongoing internal inquiry, pointing out that it has been entrusted to an official who reports directly to the PSC Chairman. Opposition voices and several stakeholders have alleged that such an arrangement could undermine the integrity of the probe and shield those responsible for the lapse.

Government's Next Steps: Legal Opinion and Cabinet Decision

In response to mounting pressure, the Home Department has decided to seek a legal opinion on whether there are any constitutional or legal hurdles to a Vigilance probe into the functioning of the PSC, which is a constitutional body. A final decision on transferring the investigation to the VACB is expected to be taken at the next meeting of the State Cabinet.

Notably, the question of whether a state vigilance body can investigate a constitutionally established commission like the PSC is itself legally complex — a factor that has prompted the government to seek legal clarity before proceeding.

Probe May Expand to Other Recruitment Processes

The controversy has also triggered scrutiny of recruitment processes for several other government posts. Complaints have been raised regarding selections for Fisheries Extension Officer, Assistant Information Officer, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Special Recruitment), Assistant Professor in Law Colleges, Kerala Administrative Service (KAS), and Public Relations Officer in universities.

According to government sources, ministers concerned have urged Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan to order impartial investigations into these recruitment processes as well. The government is reportedly considering referring these complaints to the Vigilance Department, potentially expanding the scope of the probe into alleged irregularities across public sector recruitment in the state.

How the Cabinet responds at its next sitting will determine whether this becomes a landmark accountability moment for the PSC — or another inquiry that stalls under institutional inertia.

Point of View

It is optics. The more revealing detail is that rank lists were published and appointments made before the error was even detected, suggesting quality checks failed at multiple levels. The government's instinct to seek legal cover before acting on the VACB transfer is prudent, but it also risks becoming a delay tactic. If the Cabinet does not act decisively, the expanding list of tainted recruitments — KAS, DSP, law college faculty — will compound into a systemic crisis for public employment in Kerala.
NationPress
5 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the PSC exam irregularities in Kerala?
The Kerala Public Service Commission allegedly failed to evaluate answers to 10 questions in candidate scripts during a recruitment examination for three Chief-level posts in the State Planning Board. Despite the error, the PSC published rank lists and appointed two candidates before the lapse was flagged at the Kerala Administrative Tribunal.
What is the VACB and why is Kerala considering involving it?
The Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) is Kerala's primary anti-corruption investigative agency. The state government is considering transferring the PSC inquiry to the VACB because critics have argued the PSC's internal probe lacks independence, as it is being conducted by an official who reports to the PSC Chairman.
Is there a legal hurdle to probing the PSC through the Vigilance Department?
Potentially yes. The PSC is a constitutional body, and the Home Department has sought a legal opinion on whether there are any constitutional or legal barriers to a Vigilance probe into its functioning. A Cabinet decision is awaited pending that legal clarity.
Which other recruitments are under scrutiny?
Complaints have been raised about recruitment for Fisheries Extension Officer, Assistant Information Officer, Deputy Superintendent of Police (Special Recruitment), Assistant Professor in Law Colleges, Kerala Administrative Service (KAS), and Public Relations Officer posts in universities. The government is reportedly considering referring these to the Vigilance Department as well.
What happens to the candidates who appeared for the affected exam?
The PSC had announced that all answer scripts would be re-evaluated and rank lists revised, but candidates have reportedly complained that no concrete steps have been initiated yet. The outcome for the more than 200 candidates who appeared remains uncertain pending a Cabinet decision on the probe.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 3 days ago
  3. 5 days ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google