Kerala High Court Demands ECI's Response on Postal Voting Issues Ahead of April 21 Hearing
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kochi, April 17 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court has requested the Election Commission of India (ECI) to provide clarification regarding alleged shortcomings in the postal voting procedure, which resulted in at least one government employee being unable to cast his vote. The court has scheduled a hearing on this matter for April 21.
This petition was submitted by a state government employee who claims that his constitutional right to vote was infringed upon, despite following all necessary procedures for postal voting.
The plea arises in light of similar issues raised prior to the polling in the state, where elections were held on April 9 to select 140 members for the Assembly.
Notably, this new petition has reignited attention on the commitments made to the court earlier this month.
On April 8, the ECI informed the High Court that all essential measures would be implemented to ensure that polling staff could utilize postal ballots before commencing their election duties.
This assurance was prompted by a writ petition from the Kerala NGO Union, which highlighted significant challenges encountered by government employees assigned to electoral duties.
The union pointed out that under the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, these personnel are eligible to vote via postal ballots. However, delays in the distribution of ballot papers prevented many from doing so.
The issue was particularly pressing, as the postal voting period from April 1 to April 8 coincided with tight schedules for logistical arrangements.
Reports indicated that several officials had not received their ballots even by April 6, while April 8 was mainly occupied with the collection of voting machines and other election materials, leaving limited time for casting votes.
In response, the High Court directed authorities to hasten the distribution process to ensure that all eligible staff received their ballots before 2 p.m. on April 8.
With the latest petition alleging a breakdown in implementation, the court’s involvement once again highlights concerns about the potential disenfranchisement of those responsible for overseeing the electoral process.