Is the division of municipal corporations in Telangana illegal?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Is the division of municipal corporations in Telangana illegal?

Synopsis

Union Minister G. Kishan Reddy has raised serious concerns regarding the illegal division of municipal corporations in Telangana. He argues this action, executed post-Census notification, violates essential guidelines and could lead to significant injustice for rural residents. Reddy's allegations highlight political maneuvering in the state's municipal elections, raising questions about governance and electoral integrity.

Key Takeaways

Accusations of illegality in the division of municipal corporations.
Concerns over electoral integrity during municipal elections.
Potential injustice to rural residents included in new corporations.
Lack of infrastructure plans in relation to expanded areas.
Political maneuvering alleged by the Congress party.

Hyderabad, Feb 11 (NationPress) Union Minister for Coal and Mines G. Kishan Reddy criticized the recent division of the municipal corporations of Hyderabad, Gajwel, and Nalgonda by the Telangana government, labeling it as illegal. He argued that this division was executed after the Centre issued a notification regarding the Census.

In a media briefing, he mentioned that following the Census notification, a directive was sent out across the nation indicating that revenue villages and wards should remain intact. However, the state government proceeded with the segmentation of the Gajwel, Nalgonda, and Hyderabad municipal corporations, which he deemed a completely unlawful action.

Reddy pointed out that the Census Directorate had explicitly stated that no modifications should occur after December 31, 2025, and until May 2027. He accused the state government of breaching these guidelines.

The BJP leader further asserted that during the ongoing municipal elections, the government transferred numerous IAS officers and staff from various departments in contravention of Election Commission regulations.

He emphasized that the division of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) into three separate entities was also against Election Commission protocols.

Reddy alleged that the newly formed corporations included areas situated far from municipal headquarters, which he claimed would result in injustice to impoverished residents of these villages. He noted that the employment guarantee scheme had previously benefitted the rural poor.

According to him, the state government incorporated several villages into the new corporations without a thorough plan or adequate financial resources.

He highlighted that the area of the GHMC established in 2007 covered 650 square kilometers, while the three new corporations collectively span 2,053 square kilometers. However, he insisted that there is no corresponding infrastructure development plan to support this expansion.

Reddy further claimed that the decision to split the GHMC was made unilaterally, without seeking public feedback.

While it was stated that the Outer Ring Road (ORR) would act as the boundary, he pointed out that certain areas were excluded from the ORR while others were included. Significant locations such as the airport, BHEL, and ICRISAT were omitted from the GHMC jurisdiction, he stated.

Additionally, Reddy alleged that the Congress government, under pressure from the AIMIM, included AIMIM strongholds like Rajendranagar and Maheshwaram within the core GHMC area for political motives.

Regarding the municipal elections, Reddy accused the Congress party of distributing money openly, even in the presence of police, at polling booths. He expressed frustration that despite numerous complaints, there was no action taken by the State Election Commission or police authorities.

He observed that it was evident during the campaign that the Congress was encountering significant opposition, while the BRS lacked support. Reddy accused both parties of attempting to sway the elections through financial power and acts of violence.

However, he expressed optimism that the BJP would perform well in the elections.

The Union Minister also mentioned that BJP national president Nitin Nabin expressed profound sorrow over BJP candidate Mahadevappa, who allegedly took his own life in Makthal municipality due to threats and immense pressure from the Congress party.

Point of View

It is crucial to approach the allegations raised by Union Minister G. Kishan Reddy with a balanced perspective. While his claims of illegality regarding the division of municipal corporations in Telangana are serious, they must be examined against the backdrop of the political landscape. It is essential to prioritize factual reporting and allow for diverse viewpoints to foster informed discussions among citizens.
NationPress
12 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did G. Kishan Reddy claim about the municipal corporation division?
G. Kishan Reddy claimed that the division of the Hyderabad, Gajwel, and Nalgonda municipal corporations is illegal and violates Census guidelines.
Why did Reddy label the division illegal?
He argued that the division was carried out after the Centre issued a Census notification, which prohibited changes to revenue villages and wards.
What are the implications of this division?
Reddy alleges that this division could lead to unfair treatment of poor residents and lacks a comprehensive infrastructure plan.
How did the Congress party respond to these allegations?
Reddy accused the Congress party of political manipulation during the municipal elections, including distributing money at polling booths.
What is the significance of this controversy?
This issue raises questions about electoral integrity and governance in Telangana, particularly during a critical election period.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 10 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google