Is the Kolkata Law Student Rape Case Being Overlooked by Authorities?

Click to start listening
Is the Kolkata Law Student Rape Case Being Overlooked by Authorities?

Synopsis

The recent findings of a BJP fact-finding team reveal serious allegations against the governing body of a Kolkata law college, claiming they shielded a prime accused in a law student's rape case. This shocking revelation raises questions about the integrity of institutional safeguards and the police investigation.

Key Takeaways

  • Allegations of negligence against college authorities in a rape case.
  • Concerns about police investigation procedures and accountability.
  • Political influence in university administration and its implications.
  • Importance of protecting student rights in educational institutions.
  • Call for justice and thorough investigation.

Kolkata, July 8 (NationPress) The Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) fact-finding team investigating the rape of a law student on her college campus in Kasba, Kolkata last month has released a report accusing the college's governing body of protecting one of the three accused individuals, disregarding his criminal past.

The four-member investigative committee visited Kolkata earlier this month as part of their inquiry.

They presented their findings to BJP President J.P. Nadda on Tuesday.

The report asserts that the governing body of South Calcutta Law College (new campus) played a role, both directly and indirectly, in enabling Monojit Mishra, one of the main suspects, to engage in unlawful activities on campus.

The fact-finding team claims that the governing body, led by its President and Trinamool Congress legislator Ashok Kumar Deb, hired Mishra as a contractual employee at a daily wage of Rs 500, despite his history of violence, including grievous injury to others with sharp weapons, assaulting junior students, and even sexually harassing female classmates.

“He had been incarcerated four to five times prior to this latest rape incident. The college administration was fully aware of these facts. However, due to his affiliation with the Trinamool Congress, he was appointed and permitted to act freely within the institution,” the report states.

Additionally, the fact-finding team raised concerns regarding the police investigation, noting that the initial FIR referred to the three accused—Mishra, Jaib Ahmed, and Pramit Mukhopadhyay—only by their initials rather than their full names.

“The committee is deeply skeptical about the police's handling of the case. The true perpetrator could be a powerful Trinamool Congress figure, and law enforcement may be attempting to divert attention from the actual mastermind by emphasizing this individual’s involvement,” the report highlighted.

The investigation team also questioned why Pinaki Banerjee, a college guard, is listed as an accused when he was identified as the “sole helpless witness” by the victim in her police report filed immediately following the sexual assault on the evening of June 25.

Point of View

It is crucial that the integrity of educational institutions and law enforcement is upheld. The allegations of complicity and negligence in the Kolkata law student rape case must be thoroughly investigated to restore public trust and ensure that justice prevails.
NationPress
17/07/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main accusations against the college governing body?
The governing body is accused of protecting Monojit Mishra, one of the prime suspects, ignoring his violent criminal history and allowing him to work on campus.
Who are the accused in the case?
The accused include Monojit Mishra, Jaib Ahmed, and Pramit Mukhopadhyay, with Mishra being the main suspect.
What concerns were raised about the police investigation?
The fact-finding team expressed doubts about the police investigation, noting that the initial FIR referred to the accused by initials rather than full names, raising concerns about accountability.
What role did the Trinamool Congress play in this situation?
Monojit Mishra's affiliation with the Trinamool Congress is highlighted, suggesting that it may have influenced his appointment and actions within the college.
Why is the college guard being accused?
Pinaki Banerjee, the college guard, is accused despite being identified as a 'sole helpless witness' to the incident, raising questions about the investigation's validity.