Legal Action Initiated Against Husband of Kumbh Mela Star for Underage Marriage; CPI(M) Faces Backlash
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Thiruvananthapuram/Bhopal, April 10 (NationPress) A marriage that was once heralded as a testament to Kerala’s social inclusivity has recently faced severe legal and political examination. This scrutiny arose after allegations surfaced that the bride was a minor, prompting the Madhya Pradesh Police to file a POCSO case against the groom, Farman Khan.
The inquiry conducted by the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes revealed that Monalisa Bhosle, popularly known as the ‘Kumbh Mela viral star’, was born on December 30, 2009, making her merely 16 years old at the time of her wedding.
Moreover, the Commission has accused the couple of fabricating a birth certificate to legitimize the marriage and has summoned the Directors General of Police from both Kerala and Madhya Pradesh to appear in Delhi on April 22.
This situation has cast a gloomy shadow over the high-profile wedding that took place on March 11 at a temple in Poovar, near Thiruvananthapuram, an event that had attracted considerable attention and political backing.
The ceremony unfolded under dramatic circumstances, occurring just hours after the couple sought police protection at the Thampanoor station due to threats and opposition from the bride’s family.
The political significance of this event was underscored by the attendance of key CPI(M) figures, including party State secretary M.V. Govindan and State Education Minister V. Sivankutty. A.A. Rahim, CPI-M Thiruvananthapuram District Acting Secretary and Rajya Sabha MP, had previously praised the marriage as a reflection of Kerala’s progressive values, dubbing it “the real Kerala story” where individuals of diverse backgrounds coexist harmoniously.
Initially, law enforcement had acted based on the couple’s claim that the woman was an adult with the legal right to choose her partner.
Monalisa, hailing from Indore, and Farman Khan from Maharashtra, chose Kerala for their union, anticipating challenges elsewhere due to their interfaith relationship, which began about 18 months prior through social media platforms.
The revelation of her minor status now raises significant questions regarding the circumstances surrounding the marriage, the involvement of local authorities, and the political endorsement it received, transforming what was perceived as a narrative of personal freedom into a fraught legal dispute.