Is the Vidarbha Agreement Being Disregarded by the Maha Congress?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Vidarbha Agreement: Essential for regional development and governance.
- Corruption Concerns: A significant rise in corruption under the current government.
- Winter Session Issues: Critical matters are being ignored in favor of trivial discussions.
- Leadership Accountability: The need for a Leader of Opposition is pressing.
- Democratic Norms: Importance of adhering to constitutional practices.
Nagpur, Dec 12 (NationPress) The head of Maharashtra Congress, Harshwardhan Sapkal, criticized the Maharayuti government on Friday for failing to honor the Vidarbha agreement and neglecting the concerns of the populace during the current winter session.
“Limiting Nagpur's Winter Session to a mere week shows a blatant disregard for the Vidarbha Agreement. Numerous pressing issues affecting farmers, workers, the unemployed, law and order, corruption, and women's safety have not been addressed. Instead, discussions revolve around trivial matters like capturing stray dogs or relocating leopards. The ruling party appears to have lost all seriousness regarding the session,” he claimed.
While addressing the media at the Nagpur Vidhan Bhavan, Sapkal highlighted the alarming rise in corruption under the BJP Mahayuti government.
“New corruption cases emerge daily. Money circulates unchecked. Corruption has become the government's unofficial motto. The original stance of 'I won't take bribes, nor let others do so' has devolved into 'Let’s all partake together,'” he stated.
He suggested that a white paper should be published regarding state corruption and debated in the House, yet the ruling party obstructs smooth proceedings.
“Even during critical discussions, ruling party members make jokes. Democracy is being choked. Members of the ruling coalition themselves allege corruption; the government must at least begin to recognize reality,” he asserted.
Discussing the post of Leader of Opposition, Sapkal remarked that the Mahayuti alliance cites a requirement of 10 percent membership strength for this designation.
“If that’s the case, the Upper House has the necessary 10 percent members, and a proposal is already with the government. So why is there no decision regarding the Leader of Opposition?” he questioned.
He emphasized that democratic systems adhere to certain practices, traditions, and conventions, noting that both Houses have made proposals, yet the government refuses to comply with constitutional norms.
He further criticized Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis for his arbitrary governance style.
“Fadnavis must honor democratic principles. Although he often showcases righteousness, he must adhere to conventions and regulations. Assigning the Leader of Opposition post is a constitutional obligation, but Fadnavis avoids it,” he concluded.