Has MHA Rejected the Demand for Union Territories for Kuki-Zo Tribals in Manipur?

Click to start listening
Has MHA Rejected the Demand for Union Territories for Kuki-Zo Tribals in Manipur?

Synopsis

The Ministry of Home Affairs has turned down the Kuki-Zo tribal organizations' demand for Union Territories with legislative powers in Manipur. This decision follows discussions aimed at addressing the community's concerns, highlighting the ongoing ethnic tensions and the need for constitutional protections for the Kuki-Zo people.

Key Takeaways

  • MHA has rejected Union Territory demand
  • Ethnic tensions persist in Manipur
  • Need for constitutional protections
  • Significant casualties from recent violence
  • Future governance discussions are critical

Imphal, Nov 8 (NationPress) The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has effectively dismissed the requests from Kuki-Zo tribal organizations and militant factions for the establishment of Union Territories with Legislative Authority for the Kuki-Zo community in Manipur, as stated by tribal representatives on Saturday.

The MHA engaged in discussions with representatives from Kuki-Zo armed factions, namely the Kuki National Organisation (KNO) and the United People’s Front (UPF), during a two-day conference held on November 6-7 in New Delhi. The talks primarily focused on the major demand for a Union Territory with a Legislative Assembly.

In a joint declaration, the KNO and UPF indicated that during the discussions, A.K. Mishra, Adviser for the North-East at the MHA, emphasized that while the Indian Government acknowledges the challenges faced by the Kuki-Zo populace, the existing policy framework does not endorse the formation of new Union Territories. He also highlighted the necessity for engagement with other groups in Manipur.

The KNO/UPF delegation implored the Centre to reassess its stance, arguing that the Constitution should take precedence over governmental policy.

They also noted that the current situation on the ground has rendered peaceful coexistence between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities unfeasible, necessitating the invocation of constitutional provisions to safeguard the lives and property of the Kuki-Zo.

As per the joint statement, the discussions during the two-day meeting also touched upon various topics relevant to tribal welfare, including the execution of the tripartite agreement reached on September 4 (2025) between the MHA, the Manipur government, and the SoO group.

The SoO group articulated the need to address governance and administrative issues in districts predominantly inhabited by Kuki-Zo individuals under the current conditions.

According to the September 4 agreement, the movement of both vehicles and people along the Imphal-Dimapur National Highway (NH-2), a critical route for Manipur, is set to resume. The KNO and UPF have also consented to relocate seven designated camps away from conflict-prone areas, minimize the number of camps, transfer weapons to the nearest CRPF and BSF camps, and ensure thorough verification of individuals by security forces to eliminate foreign nationals, if present.

A Joint Monitoring Group will oversee the enforcement of established regulations, with strict actions to be taken against any violations, including a review of the SoO Agreement, as stated in an official release following the September 4 meeting.

The UPF and KNO, which represent a coalition of 23 underground groups, formalized the SoO agreement with the government on August 22, 2008. Approximately 2,266 militants from these outfits are currently situated in various designated camps across the hilly regions of Manipur.

Since the outbreak of ethnic clashes on May 3, 2023, between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities, which was sparked by a ‘Tribal Solidarity March’ protesting the Meitei community's quest for Scheduled Tribe status, over 260 fatalities have been reported, alongside 1,500 injuries and the displacement of over 70,000 individuals.

Manipur has been under President’s Rule since February 13, just four days after N. Biren Singh resigned as Chief Minister on February 9. The state's 60-member assembly is currently in suspended animation, with a term lasting until 2027.

Point of View

It's crucial to recognize the delicate balance of community rights and state policies. The MHA's stance reflects a broader challenge of governance in multicultural societies. While the demand for Union Territories is substantial, the emphasis must remain on dialogue and constitutional safeguards to ensure peace and coexistence.
NationPress
09/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MHA's stance on Kuki-Zo's demand?
The MHA has effectively rejected the demand for Union Territories with legislative powers for the Kuki-Zo community, emphasizing the need for broader consultations.
What are the implications of this decision?
The rejection may exacerbate existing ethnic tensions in Manipur, necessitating urgent dialogue and constitutional measures to protect the Kuki-Zo community.
What actions were discussed in the talks?
The talks included discussions on governance, relocation of camps, and the implementation of a tripartite agreement concerning the Kuki-Zo's welfare.
What is the current situation in Manipur?
Manipur has witnessed significant ethnic violence, leading to over 260 deaths, 1,500 injuries, and the displacement of more than 70,000 people since May 2023.
What is the future outlook for the Kuki-Zo community?
The future remains uncertain, with calls for constitutional protections and administrative reforms essential for safeguarding the Kuki-Zo people's rights.
Nation Press