MP High Court hears bail cancellation pleas in Twisha Sharma case, next date May 27
Synopsis
A former district and sessions judge remains on anticipatory bail in the Twisha Sharma dowry death case — even as the Supreme Court watches suo motu and both the state government and the victim's father demand her custody. The 27 May MP High Court hearing could be a turning point.
Key Takeaways
The Madhya Pradesh High Court heard bail cancellation pleas against Giribala Singh on 25 May , scheduling the next date for 27 May .
Giribala Singh , a former district and sessions judge and mother-in-law of the deceased, was granted anticipatory bail on 15 May .
Twisha Sharma , 33 , died under suspicious circumstances in Bhopal's Katara Hills on 12 May .
Both the State Government and Twisha's father allege Giribala Singh is not cooperating with the SIT and risks tampering with evidence.
The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of the case, adding judicial pressure on proceedings.
The second post-mortem report and forensic evidence are expected to be central to the investigation's next phase.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday, 25 May heard two petitions seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Giribala Singh — the deceased's mother-in-law and a former district and sessions judge — in the high-profile Twisha Sharma dowry death case. The next hearing has been scheduled for 27 May.
What Happened in Court
A single-judge bench of Justice Devanarayan Mishra took up both petitions together — one filed by the Madhya Pradesh State Government and another by Twisha Sharma's father. Both petitions argue that Giribala Singh is not cooperating with the ongoing investigation and poses a risk of tampering with evidence if she remains on bail.
During the hearing, counsel for Giribala Singh submitted that they had not yet received a copy of the petition filed by Twisha's father. The court directed that a copy be furnished to the respondent before the next date.
Legal Representation
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Advocate General Prashant Singh appeared for the State Government. Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra represented the complainant — Twisha's father. Senior Advocate Nitya Ramakrishna, along with Enosh George Carlo, appeared on behalf of Giribala Singh.
Background: The Twisha Sharma Case
Twisha Sharma, 33, died under suspicious circumstances at her in-laws' residence in Bhopal's Katara Hills on the night of 12 May. Her post-mortem was conducted the following day. Giribala Singh applied for anticipatory bail on 14 May, which was granted by the court on 15 May.
The State Government's petition highlights that the former judge is an accused in the dowry harassment and abetment to suicide case and has allegedly not been cooperating with the Special Investigation Team (SIT). Twisha's father has separately challenged the bail, demanding stricter action against all accused.
Supreme Court and Wider Scrutiny
The case has drawn significant public and judicial attention after the Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the matter — a rare step that underscores the gravity of the allegations and the profile of the accused. The fact that Giribala Singh is a former judicial officer has added a layer of institutional sensitivity to the proceedings.
What Comes Next
The outcome of the bail cancellation pleas is being closely watched. The second post-mortem report and other forensic evidence are expected to play a decisive role in shaping the investigation. The 27 May hearing will be critical in determining whether Giribala Singh's anticipatory bail is revoked.
Point of View
Someone who spent a career interpreting the very laws she now stands accused of violating. The swift grant of anticipatory bail on 15 May, just three days after Twisha Sharma's death, has rightly drawn scrutiny. The Supreme Court's suo motu intervention signals that the apex judiciary does not trust the lower proceedings to run without oversight. The real test on 27 May is whether the High Court will prioritise investigative integrity over the professional standing of the accused — and whether the SIT's non-cooperation claims are backed by documentary evidence strong enough to revoke bail.
NationPress
13 Jul 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is Giribala Singh in the Twisha Sharma case?
Giribala Singh is the mother-in-law of the deceased Twisha Sharma and a former district and sessions judge. She is an accused in the dowry harassment and abetment to suicide case and was granted anticipatory bail on 15 May, two days after applying for it.
What happened to Twisha Sharma?
Twisha Sharma, 33, died under suspicious circumstances at her in-laws' residence in Bhopal's Katara Hills on the night of 12 May. Her death is being investigated as a dowry death and abetment to suicide case.
Why are the petitions seeking cancellation of Giribala Singh's bail?
Both the Madhya Pradesh State Government and Twisha's father argue that Giribala Singh is not cooperating with the Special Investigation Team and poses a risk of tampering with evidence. They contend these grounds warrant revocation of her anticipatory bail.
Why has the Supreme Court intervened in this case?
The Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the Twisha Sharma case, reflecting the gravity of the allegations and the high-profile nature of the accused. Suo motu intervention means the apex court initiated review on its own, without a formal petition.
What is the next step in the Twisha Sharma case?
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has scheduled the next hearing on the bail cancellation pleas for 27 May. The second post-mortem report and forensic evidence are expected to significantly influence the direction of the investigation.
