NHRC takes cognisance of two child rights violations in Madhya Pradesh

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
NHRC takes cognisance of two child rights violations in Madhya Pradesh

Synopsis

The NHRC has stepped in on two deeply troubling cases from Madhya Pradesh: nine schoolchildren risking their lives daily on a check-dam crossing over the Betwa River, and a Dalit Class 4 student assaulted by a teacher for drinking water from his own bottle. Both cases expose the gap between constitutional guarantees and ground reality for children in the state.

Key Takeaways

The NHRC has taken suo motu cognisance of two child rights cases in Madhya Pradesh and issued notices to the Chief Secretary .
Nine students , including five girls , from Kakraua village, Vidisha , cross exposed check-dam pillars over the Betwa River daily — cutting a 13 km road journey to 1.5 km .
One student reportedly failed her final exams after missing school because she was too short to make the crossing.
A Dalit Class 4 student in Ukawal village, Shivpuri , was allegedly assaulted and subjected to casteist slurs by a teacher on 28 July for drinking water from his own bottle.
The NHRC has also issued a notice to the Superintendent of Police, Shivpuri , seeking the status of statutory relief provided to the victim.
State authorities have two weeks to submit detailed reports to the Commission.

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has taken suo motu cognisance of two separate media reports flagging serious human rights violations involving schoolchildren in Madhya Pradesh, issuing notices to the state's Chief Secretary and demanding detailed responses within two weeks. Both cases — one involving a life-threatening river crossing and another involving caste-based assault on a Dalit child — point to systemic failures in ensuring safe, dignified education in the state.

Children Risk Lives Crossing Betwa River to Reach School

In the first case, the NHRC noted reports about students from Kakraua village in Vidisha district who cross the Betwa River daily by hopping across exposed pillars of a check dam. The dangerous route cuts the journey from 13 km by road to just 1.5 km, but requires children to navigate wide gaps between pillars over flowing water.

According to reports, nine students — including five girls — take this route every day. A video of the children carefully making the crossing has circulated widely on social media, drawing public attention to the hazard. Villagers have said they are unable to escort the children to school as they work in agricultural fields, leaving families with a stark choice: risk the crossing or forfeit education.

One student reportedly failed her final examinations after missing school on days when she was too short to jump across the pillars.

What the NHRC Said on the River Crossing Case

The Commission observed that the absence of a safe mode of transport for these children amounts to a negation of their fundamental right to education with dignity. It cited Article 21A of the Constitution, which guarantees free and compulsory education for children aged 6 to 14 years, reinforced by the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

The NHRC also invoked the Supreme Court's ruling in Avinash Mehrotra vs. Union of India (2009), which held that the right to education encompasses the right to a safe school and safe infrastructure. Notably, while the District Education Officer reportedly inspected the site and informed the District Collector, no timeline has been fixed for constructing a safe passage.

Dalit Student Assaulted by Teacher in Shivpuri

In a separate incident, the NHRC took cognisance of a report that a Class 4 student from the Dalit community was physically assaulted and subjected to casteist slurs by a teacher at a Government Primary School in Ukawal village, Shivpuri district, on 28 July this year. The teacher allegedly became enraged upon seeing the boy drinking water from his own bottle.

The child subsequently informed his parents, who lodged a complaint with the police. The Commission has observed that the contents of the report, if true, raise serious issues of human rights violations. Notices have been issued to the Madhya Pradesh Chief Secretary and the Superintendent of Police, Shivpuri, with the response expected to include the status of statutory relief provided to the victim.

Systemic Concerns and What Comes Next

Both incidents, the Commission noted, underscore persistent gaps in protecting children's rights to education, safety, and dignity in Madhya Pradesh. This is not the first time the NHRC has intervened on school safety in Indian states — the body has previously flagged inadequate infrastructure and caste-based discrimination in school settings across multiple states.

State authorities have two weeks to submit detailed reports. The Commission's findings could trigger further directions on interim relief, infrastructure timelines, and action against the accused teacher. Whether the Madhya Pradesh government — led by Chief Minister Mohan Yadav — moves beyond inspection to concrete remediation will be closely watched.

Point of View

If verified, is a straightforward violation of the Protection of Civil Rights Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, yet the NHRC's intervention suggests the state machinery has not moved with urgency. NHRC notices are not self-executing; without a compliance mechanism and a hard deadline for structural fixes, they risk becoming procedural exercises that leave the children in the same danger.
NationPress
7 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has the NHRC intervened in these two Madhya Pradesh cases?
The NHRC took suo motu cognisance of media reports on both incidents because they raise serious concerns about children's fundamental rights to education, safety, and dignity. The Commission has the power to act on its own when credible reports suggest human rights violations, without waiting for a formal complaint.
What is the Betwa River crossing case about?
Nine students from Kakraua village in Vidisha district, including five girls, cross exposed pillars of a check dam over the Betwa River daily to reach school, reducing a 13 km road journey to 1.5 km. The NHRC noted this endangers their lives and violates their right to education under Article 21A and the RTE Act, 2009.
What happened to the Dalit student in Shivpuri?
A Class 4 Dalit student at a Government Primary School in Ukawal village, Shivpuri, was allegedly assaulted and subjected to casteist slurs by a teacher on 28 July after the teacher saw him drinking water from his own bottle. The child's parents subsequently filed a police complaint.
What has the NHRC asked state authorities to do?
The Commission has issued notices to the Madhya Pradesh Chief Secretary and, in the Shivpuri case, also to the Superintendent of Police, Shivpuri. Both are required to submit detailed reports within two weeks, including the status of any statutory relief provided to the assault victim.
What legal provisions did the NHRC cite in the river crossing case?
The NHRC cited Article 21A of the Constitution, the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, and the Supreme Court's ruling in Avinash Mehrotra vs. Union of India (2009), which established that the right to education includes the right to a safe school and safe infrastructure.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 7 months ago
  4. 10 months ago
  5. 10 months ago
  6. 10 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google