Has the NIA Filed Charges Against Another Accused in the Maoism Revival Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The NIA has recently charged another suspect, Vishal Singh, in the ongoing investigation into the CPI (Maoist) organization's attempts to revive its influence in northern India. This development highlights the continued efforts of law enforcement to combat terrorism in the region.
Key Takeaways
- Charges filed against Vishal Singh
- Focus on CPI (Maoist) resurgence
- Legal ramifications under IPC and UAPA
- Impact of NIA investigations on national security
- Continuing battle against terrorism in northern India
New Delhi, Nov 29 (NationPress) The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has taken action by filing charges against an additional suspect involved in efforts by the proscribed CPI (Maoist) terrorist organization to regain its foothold in northern regions.
The individual apprehended, Vishal Singh alias Suraj, a resident of Mathura (UP), has been charged under section 121A of IPC and sections 18, 20, 38 & 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
He becomes the second individual to be charged in the case designated as RC-01/2023/NIA-LKW.
In February, the NIA previously charged Ajay Singhal alias Aman in relation to collective efforts by leaders, members, and supporters of the CPI (Maoist) to rejuvenate the organization across the northern states of UP, Uttarakhand, Delhi, Punjab, Haryana, and Himachal Pradesh.
According to NIA investigations, Vishal Singh, a member of the CPI (Maoist), spent ten days in the Chhakarbandha/Pachrukhiya forest area to instruct the group’s cadre on the operation of a drone he was carrying.
He also held meetings with senior leaders of CPI (Maoist), including Pramod Mishra alias Sohan Da and Sandeep Yadav alias Rupesh Ji, who is a member of the Bihar Jharkhand Special Area Committee (BJSAC).
In a separate development, a special court of the NIA has convicted two additional suspects in the Lucknow Al-Qaeda terror conspiracy case.
The NIA reported that Mohd. Mustaqueem and Shakeel, both from Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh), were found guilty under section 25 (1B)(a) of the Arms Act, in conjunction with section 120B of the IPC.
The special court in Lucknow sentenced them to 20 months in prison, and a fine of Rs 5000 was imposed on each.
Previously, on October 30, 2025, the court had convicted Mohammad Moid from Lucknow in the same case, which involved the arrest of two members of the banned Al-Qaeda terrorist organization.
On July 11, 2021, the UP Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) apprehended an Al-Qaeda member, Umar Halmandi, in Lucknow for radicalization and recruitment activities for AQIS (Al-Qaeda in Indian Subcontinent).
The ATS action on July 11, 2021, was based on information that Umar Halmandi was involved in the radicalization and recruitment of individuals for AQIS in Lucknow.
Investigations revealed that Umar, operating near the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, was in Lucknow recruiting youth to carry out terrorist activities in various cities of U.P. ahead of Independence Day 2021.
Point of View
It is our duty to report on the NIA's ongoing efforts to counter terrorist activities, particularly those linked to the CPI (Maoist). This case signifies a crucial step in maintaining national security and highlights the challenges faced by law enforcement in curtailing such extremist movements.
NationPress
29/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the CPI (Maoist)?
The CPI (Maoist) is a banned Maoist organization in India, known for its violent insurgency and attempts to establish a communist state through armed struggle.
What charges has Vishal Singh faced?
Vishal Singh has been charged under section 121A of the IPC and various sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
What is the role of the NIA?
The NIA is a central agency responsible for investigating and prosecuting offenses related to terrorism and national security.
What are the consequences of these charges?
If convicted, Vishal Singh and others could face significant prison sentences and fines, reflecting the severity of their alleged crimes.
Why is this case significant?
This case is significant as it represents ongoing efforts to combat terrorism and the attempts of banned organizations to regain influence in India.
