Congress demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation, calls for full ECI IT overhaul

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Congress demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation, calls for full ECI IT overhaul

Synopsis

Congress's Jairam Ramesh has gone beyond protest slogans — he's now calling for the CEC's head and a root-and-branch rebuild of the ECI's IT systems, alleging the poll body deliberately blocked searchable voter rolls for eight years after the Congress caught bogus voters in Madhya Pradesh in 2018. With the INDIA bloc on the streets and the SIR rollout covering 17 states, the battle over India's electoral machinery is entering its sharpest phase yet.

Key Takeaways

Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh demanded the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on 18 October 2026 .
Ramesh alleged the ECI withheld searchable electoral rolls from political parties for eight years — since 2018 — to enable alleged 'vote chori.' The ECI issued an order on 15 October restoring searchable voter roll access for the Special Summary Revision (SSR) , resuming after a two-year gap in 17 states and UTs .
Ramesh demanded the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) be suspended, alleging it puts the voting rights of over 13 crore Indians at risk.
The INDIA bloc has joined the Congress in demanding CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation and a full overhaul of the ECI's IT infrastructure.

Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh on Sunday, 18 October 2026, launched a sharp attack on Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, demanding his resignation and calling for a comprehensive overhaul of the Election Commission of India (ECI) and its IT infrastructure, alleging that the poll body had deliberately withheld searchable electoral rolls from political parties for eight years to enable what he termed 'vote chori' (vote theft).

The Core Allegation: Eight Years of Withheld Voter Rolls

Ramesh alleged that the ECI had stopped providing searchable voter rolls in 2018, shortly after the Congress reportedly identified lakhs of bogus voters in Madhya Pradesh. He claimed that despite repeated demands from both the Congress and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi over the past two years, the poll body had consistently refused to restore searchable access to electoral rolls.

According to Ramesh, the ECI issued an order on 15 October permitting political parties to access electoral rolls in searchable format for the Special Summary Revision (SSR) — a process that has resumed after a gap of two years across 17 states and Union Territories. He attributed this reversal to sustained pressure from Opposition parties protesting alleged electoral irregularities.

What Ramesh Said on X

In a post on the social media platform X, Ramesh alleged a pattern of shifting tactics by the ruling dispensation whenever electoral irregularities were flagged. 'Every time Vote Chori is caught, the Modi Govt adopts a new tactic: stopping readable voter rolls, fake voter additions, SIR. But not this time,' he said.

On the Chief Election Commissioner directly, Ramesh was unequivocal: 'Nothing can save the CEC Gyanesh Kumar who, acting on the instructions of the PM and the HM, has destroyed public trust and confidence in the ECI. He simply has to go. But that alone will not be enough. The ECI itself along with its IT system has to be thoroughly revamped,' he added.

The SIR Controversy and What the Opposition Wants

The broader dispute centres on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, which Opposition parties — including those in the INDIA bloc — allege puts the Constitutional right to vote of over 13 crore Indians at risk. Ramesh specifically demanded that the SIR be 'suspended forthwith.'

The ECI, for its part, has maintained that the revision exercise is intended to update and clean electoral rolls — a standard administrative process. The poll body has not publicly addressed the specific allegation regarding the eight-year withholding of searchable voter data.

Broader Opposition Mobilisation

The Congress is not alone in its protest. Multiple Opposition parties have joined demonstrations against CEC Gyanesh Kumar, with the INDIA bloc formally demanding his resignation. Critics argue that the confluence of the SIR rollout, the earlier denial of searchable rolls, and the poll body's perceived proximity to the ruling establishment amount to a structural erosion of electoral credibility.

Notably, this is not the first time the ECI's independence has come under scrutiny — similar allegations of partisan functioning were raised during state elections in 2022 and 2023. The current controversy, however, is broader in scope, targeting the commission's core voter-roll management systems.

What Happens Next

The demand for CEC Gyanesh Kumar's resignation is unlikely to be acted upon immediately, given that the appointment process for the Chief Election Commissioner is governed by statute and does not provide for executive removal on the basis of Opposition demands alone. However, the political pressure could intensify ahead of upcoming state assembly elections, with voter-roll integrity set to remain a flashpoint between the treasury benches and the Opposition through the electoral calendar.

Point of View

Factual rebuttal from the ECI — not silence. If true, it points to a structural manipulation of the electoral process; if false, the Commission has every reason to release records that disprove it. What is striking is that the ECI's 15 October order restoring searchable access came precisely as Opposition pressure peaked, which — regardless of intent — creates the appearance of concession under duress. The broader demand for a CEC resignation and IT overhaul reflects a deeper crisis of institutional legitimacy that cosmetic responses will not resolve. India's elections are only as credible as the rolls that underpin them.
NationPress
18 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Congress demanding the resignation of CEC Gyanesh Kumar?
Congress alleges that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar acted on the instructions of the Prime Minister and Home Minister to undermine public trust in the ECI, including by withholding searchable voter rolls for eight years. The party says his continuation in office is incompatible with free and fair elections.
What is the controversy over searchable electoral rolls?
Congress claims the ECI stopped providing electoral rolls in searchable format in 2018, shortly after the party reportedly found lakhs of bogus voters in Madhya Pradesh, and that this denial persisted for eight years despite repeated demands. The ECI issued an order on 15 October restoring searchable access for the Special Summary Revision process.
What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) and why is it controversial?
The Special Intensive Revision is an electoral roll update exercise that the ECI says is meant to clean and update voter lists. Opposition parties allege it puts the Constitutional voting rights of over 13 crore Indians at risk and have demanded its immediate suspension.
What has the Election Commission of India said in response?
The ECI has maintained that the Special Summary Revision process is a standard administrative exercise to update electoral rolls. It has not publicly addressed the specific allegation that searchable voter data was withheld for eight years.
What are the next steps in this political standoff?
A formal removal of the CEC on Opposition demand is not provided for under current statute, making an immediate resignation unlikely. However, political pressure is expected to intensify ahead of upcoming state elections, with voter-roll integrity set to remain a central Opposition campaign issue.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 weeks ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 3 weeks ago
  4. 3 weeks ago
  5. 3 weeks ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google