Did Operation Blue Star Collaborate with the British?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Operation Blue Star was a pivotal event in Indian history.
- Allegations of foreign collaboration raise important questions.
- The Sikh community's historical treatment by political entities is a concern.
- Public outrage and political appointments can significantly influence narratives.
- Understanding the Kartarpur Sahib issue is crucial for contemporary discourse.
New Delhi, July 7 (NationPress) BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has asserted that the contentious Operation Blue Star in 1984, which took place at the Golden Temple, was executed with the assistance of the British government.
Dubey alleged that British military personnel were present in Amritsar during the operation, which aimed to eliminate militants who had taken refuge within the Golden Temple complex.
“In 1984, Indira Gandhi directed an assault on the Golden Temple in conjunction with the British. British army officers were in Amritsar at that time,” Dubey stated in a post on X on Monday.
“The Congress party has historically viewed the Sikh community merely as a political tool,” he continued.
Dubey referenced a confidential letter dated February 23, 1984, from Brian Fall, who was then the Private Secretary at the UK’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office. The letter was addressed to Hugh Taylor, the Private Secretary to the Home Secretary.
The letter disclosed by Dubey indicated: “The Indian authorities recently sought British counsel regarding a strategy to remove Sikh extremists from the Golden Temple in Amritsar. The Foreign Secretary decided to respond positively to the Indian request, and with the Prime Minister’s consent, an SAS (Special Air Service) officer visited India to devise a plan that received Mrs. Gandhi’s approval. The Foreign Secretary believes that the Indian Government may initiate the plan shortly.”
Dubey accused the Congress-led administration of not only orchestrating the military operation with foreign involvement but also employing constitutional appointments to mitigate public discontent following the incident.
“While innocent devotees lost their lives during the 1984 assault on the Golden Temple, the Congress government appointed Giani Zail Singh as the President of India,” he remarked.
He further contended that the appointment of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in 2004 was a strategic move intended to protect Congress leaders implicated in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
“Manmohan Singh was positioned as a puppet Prime Minister to shield the accused -- H.K.L. Bhagat, Jagdish Tytler, and Sajjan Kumar -- and to obscure the massacre,” Dubey noted, adding, “The Congress has a longstanding pattern of compromising national interests and conspiring with foreign entities.”
Dubey also brought attention to the Kartarpur Sahib shrine, asserting that India lost access to the sacred site due to a 1960 agreement established by the then Congress minister Sardar Swaran Singh.
Earlier on Sunday, Dubey accused the Congress government of having “ceded 80 percent of India's share of Indus River waters and Kartarpur Sahib to Pakistan” under the Indus Waters Treaty signed in 1960.