Are US Strikes on Iran a Violation of International Law?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold statement, AIMIM's Asaduddin Owaisi condemns the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities as violations of both international law and UN principles. He raises questions about US double standards regarding nuclear weapons, and the potential consequences for regional stability and the Indian diaspora.
Key Takeaways
- US strikes on Iran are seen as unlawful.
- Owaisi criticizes US double standards on nuclear weapons.
- Iran may enhance its uranium enrichment significantly.
- Regional instability could affect Indians in the Middle East.
- Pakistan's role in the situation raises further questions.
Hyderabad, June 22 (NationPress) AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi has criticized the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, labeling them a breach of international law and the United Nations charter.
The MP from Hyderabad accused the US of attempting to distract from the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza through these military actions.
Owaisi expressed confidence that such assaults will not dissuade Iran from pursuing its nuclear program.
He informed reporters that the US strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran are infringing upon international statutes, the United Nations charter, the NPT (Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons), and the US Constitution.
He emphasized that according to the US Constitution, military action cannot be initiated without Congress's consent.
Owaisi raised concerns about the US's inconsistent stance regarding Israel’s nuclear arsenal. “There is little discourse about Israel, which possesses 700-800 nuclear warheads, has not ratified the NPT, and denies access to IAEA inspectors,” he stated.
The AIMIM leader predicted that Iran will achieve 90% Uranium enrichment within the next 5-10 years. “Iran will not be halted. It may withdraw from the NPT,” he asserted.
Owaisi further opined that in response to US actions against Iran, Arab and Muslim nations might pursue nuclear capabilities to counter Israel’s dominance. “You will not be able to prevent them,” he warned.
He mentioned that US intelligence has confirmed that Iran lacks nuclear weapons, referencing a statement from Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of US Intelligence.
Owaisi also expressed concern regarding the potential repercussions of a regional conflict for the 6 million Indians residing there, along with the significant investments and foreign remittances that they contribute.
He criticized Pakistan, questioning if Islamabad sought the Nobel Peace Prize for Trump for instigating war in the Middle East. “Did Pakistan's General (Army chief Asim Munir) dine with the US president for this?” he inquired.
Point of View
The remarks by Asaduddin Owaisi highlight the complexities of international relations and the potential ramifications of unilateral military actions. The situation necessitates a careful examination of legal frameworks and the balance of power in the region, emphasizing the importance of multilateral dialogue and diplomacy.
NationPress
22/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the implications of US strikes on Iran?
The US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities could escalate tensions in the Middle East and provoke a regional arms race, particularly among Arab and Muslim nations.
Is there any legal basis for Owaisi's claims?
Owaisi cites violations of international law, the UN charter, and the US Constitution as key legal grounds for his criticism of the strikes.
How does this affect the Indian community in the region?
The potential for conflict poses a significant risk to the 6 million Indians living in the region, impacting both their safety and economic contributions.
