Owaisi to Modi: Remove Chinese troops from Arunachal or quit
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A blunt two-line ultimatum — remove the Chinese military from Arunachal Pradesh or vacate the office. AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi directed that stark challenge at Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday, 26 October 2026, in a post that compressed one of India's most sensitive territorial flashpoints into a single, unambiguous demand.
Posting directly to the Prime Minister's handle, Owaisi wrote in Hindi: 'Arunachal Pradesh se Cheeni fauj ko hatao, warna gaddi chhodo' — 'Remove the Chinese army from Arunachal Pradesh, or give up the throne.' No qualifications, no diplomatic hedging. The register was deliberately combative, aimed squarely at the government's stewardship of India's northeastern frontier.
Why Arunachal sits at the heart of the India-China fault line
Arunachal Pradesh, a state of roughly 84,000 square kilometres bordering China, Bhutan, and Myanmar, has been claimed by Beijing as 'South Tibet' for decades. China periodically objects to visits by Indian officials — including the Prime Minister — to the state, and regularly renames locations within its boundaries. The dispute traces back to the 1962 Sino-Indian War, which left the eastern sector of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) undefined and contested.
India has consistently rejected Beijing's claims, asserting that Arunachal Pradesh is, in the words of successive governments, 'an integral and inalienable part of India.' Yet the LAC's unresolved status means any perceived incursion or presence of Chinese troops on the Indian side of the boundary carries enormous political and strategic weight.
Owaisi's ultimatum in the wider opposition playbook
This is not the first time Owaisi has used the LAC as a cudgel against the Modi government. The June 2020 Galwan Valley clash — which killed 20 Indian soldiers and an unconfirmed number of Chinese troops — gave opposition parties, including AIMIM, a recurring line of attack on the government's China policy. Since Galwan, India and China have held multiple rounds of Corps Commander-level talks, leading to phased disengagement in eastern Ladakh; whether comparable progress has been made on the Arunachal sector remains a subject of political dispute.
Owaisi, as a Lok Sabha MP from Hyderabad and a consistent voice on national security in Parliament, frames the demand through the lens of sovereignty. His phrasing — 'gaddi chhodo' ('give up the throne') — is a direct echo of the kind of rhetorical pressure that has defined opposition politics in the post-Galwan era: tie territorial integrity to the ruling party's legitimacy, and dare the government to respond.
The Ministry of External Affairs has not issued a public response to the post. Any official communication on LAC management or forthcoming India-China border talks would be the next significant data point in this political standoff.
Sovereignty demands, it turns out, do not wait for diplomatic timelines — and Owaisi is making sure the Prime Minister's timeline includes an answer.