Ujjain land deal: Patwari's allegations are Congress stand, Digvijaya spoke personally, says Harish Chaudhary

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ujjain land deal: Patwari's allegations are Congress stand, Digvijaya spoke personally, says Harish Chaudhary

Synopsis

A public split between two senior Congress leaders over the alleged Ujjain land deal forced the party's central leadership to intervene. AICC In-charge Harish Chaudhary drew a sharp line: Patwari's ₹500 crore land-transfer allegation against CM Mohan Yadav is official Congress policy; Digvijaya Singh's divergent remarks — and his proposed padyatra — are strictly personal. The clarification signals that the Congress high command is backing its state chief, even as Bharat Nyas pursues legal action against Patwari.

Key Takeaways

AICC General Secretary Harish Chaudhary declared on 10 July that Jitu Patwari's allegations over the Ujjain land deal represent Congress's official party position.
Digvijaya Singh's separate remarks and proposed padyatra from Ujjain to Adhiya were described as personal, not party-sanctioned programmes.
Patwari had alleged that government land in Ujjain worth approximately ₹500 crore was transferred to Bharat Nyas for just ₹1 .
The BJP has called the allegations 'baseless' and 'politically motivated.' Bharat Nyas has issued a legal notice to Patwari , demanding withdrawal of the statements and a public apology.

All India Congress Committee (AICC) General Secretary and Madhya Pradesh In-charge Harish Chaudhary on Friday, 10 July moved to end speculation over conflicting statements within the state Congress, asserting that State Congress Chief Jitu Patwari's allegations against Chief Minister Mohan Yadav over the alleged Ujjain land deal constitute the party's official position, while former Chief Minister Digvijaya Singh's divergent remarks were made in a personal capacity.

Chaudhary made the clarification during a press conference in Indore, where Congress leaders were targeting the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led state government over a separate issue — the alleged theft of donations at the Ram temple in Ayodhya.

What Chaudhary Said

'Jitu Patwari's press conference was an official Congress press conference. Whatever he said regarding the alleged land scam is the Congress party's official stand. If there are any discrepancies in facts or figures, other leaders have the right to express their views, but Jitu Patwari's statement remains the party's official position,' Chaudhary said, responding directly to questions about Digvijaya Singh's differing remarks.

On Digvijaya Singh's separate media interaction in Ujjain — which had triggered speculation of internal divisions — Chaudhary was unambiguous: 'Digvijaya Singh's press conference was his personal press conference. Likewise, his proposed padyatra is also his personal programme. He himself has stated that it is not a Congress programme.'

The Ujjain Land Deal Controversy

The row centres on allegations made by Patwari that the BJP government transferred government land in Ujjain, reportedly worth around ₹500 crore, to Bharat Nyas for just ₹1. The BJP has rejected these allegations as 'baseless' and 'politically motivated.'

The controversy has since taken a legal turn. Bharat Nyas has issued a legal notice to Patwari, demanding that he withdraw his statements and offer a public apology. The trust has denied the allegations and maintained that the land transaction was conducted in full compliance with the law.

The Digvijaya Factor

A day after Patwari's press conference, Digvijaya Singh addressed a separate media interaction in Ujjain where his characterisation of the issue appeared to diverge from Patwari's presentation, fuelling speculation of a rift within the state Congress. Chaudhary's intervention is widely seen as an effort by the party's central leadership to close ranks behind its state unit chief and present a unified front against the BJP government.

When asked whether he would join Digvijaya Singh's proposed foot march from Ujjain to Adhiya, Chaudhary declined, noting: 'It is not a Congress march. He himself has clarified that it is not a political march.'

What Happens Next

With Bharat Nyas pursuing legal action against Patwari and the BJP pressing its 'baseless allegations' line, the Congress faces pressure to either substantiate its ₹500 crore land transfer claim with documentary evidence or risk the controversy rebounding on its own state leadership. The party's ability to sustain a coordinated attack on the BJP government may hinge on whether Digvijaya Singh's independent positioning continues to complicate the official narrative.

Point of View

Often complicating coordinated campaign messaging. Digvijaya Singh's independent Ujjain positioning is not new — his solo padyatras and media interactions have historically created friction with party strategy. The more consequential question is whether Patwari's ₹500 crore allegation can survive legal scrutiny from Bharat Nyas. If the Congress cannot produce documentary evidence, the BJP's 'baseless' framing may gain traction ahead of any electoral cycle in Madhya Pradesh.
NationPress
11 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Ujjain land deal allegation made by Jitu Patwari?
Congress's Madhya Pradesh unit chief Jitu Patwari alleged that the BJP-led state government transferred government land in Ujjain, reportedly worth around ₹500 crore, to Bharat Nyas for just ₹1. The BJP has denied the allegations, calling them baseless and politically motivated.
Why did Harish Chaudhary issue a clarification on 10 July?
Chaudhary intervened to end speculation over an apparent rift after Digvijaya Singh's remarks at a separate media interaction in Ujjain diverged from Patwari's official allegations. He clarified that Patwari's press conference was an official Congress programme and its content represents the party's position.
Are Digvijaya Singh's remarks and padyatra official Congress programmes?
No. Harish Chaudhary explicitly stated that Digvijaya Singh's press conference and his proposed foot march from Ujjain to Adhiya are personal programmes, not official Congress activities. Singh himself has reportedly clarified that the padyatra is not a political march.
What legal action has been taken over the Ujjain land deal allegations?
Bharat Nyas has issued a legal notice to Jitu Patwari, demanding that he withdraw his statements and apologise. The trust has denied the allegations and stated that the land transaction was conducted in accordance with the law.
What is the BJP's response to the Congress allegations?
The BJP has rejected the allegations as 'baseless' and 'politically motivated,' maintaining that there was no wrongdoing in the land transaction involving Bharat Nyas in Ujjain.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 2 weeks ago
  5. 2 weeks ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 9 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google