Rahul, Akhilesh can be 'fake' PM and CM, says UP Dy CM Maurya; SP fires back
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya on Monday, 2 November sharply targeted Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav over the INDIA Bloc's 'Chalo Dilli' march in New Delhi, claiming the rally at Ramlila Maidan was a 'flop show' that drew only a fraction of the crowd organisers had promised. The Samajwadi Party hit back swiftly, alleging that Maurya had been sidelined within his own party and would do better to focus on his political standing inside the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Maurya's Claim on Rally Turnout
In a post on X, Maurya alleged that the Congress and the INDIA Bloc had set a target of gathering 10 lakh people at Ramlila Maidan but only ten thousand turned up. 'The entire event turned out to be a flop show, and the public has rejected the designs to topple the government of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi,' he wrote. The figures cited by Maurya were not independently verified.
Taking a further dig, Maurya said both leaders could only attain 'fake' versions of the top posts. 'Shri Rahul Gandhi can become a fake Prime Minister and Shri Akhilesh Yadav a fake Chief Minister, but not real ones; it will take both of them 30 years to attain real positions. Until 'Viksit Bharat' and 'Viksit Uttar Pradesh' are achieved, Congress-SP will not come to power, and BJP will not go out of power. BJP alone is the present and future of India and Uttar Pradesh,' he added.
SP's Counterattack on Maurya
The Samajwadi Party wasted no time responding. SP spokesperson Ashutosh Verma said Maurya was a prominent leader from Uttar Pradesh but had been pushed to the sidelines because of internal dynamics within the ruling party. 'Keshav Prasad Maurya is a very good leader from Uttar Pradesh, but he has been sidelined due to internal politics within the BJP. I have great sympathy for him as he has been unable to win elections recently. He should focus on winning this election and not get caught up in discussions about being a shadow Prime Minister or shadow Chief Minister,' Verma said.
Verma also took aim at how Maurya had been treated as a PDA (Pichda, Dalit, Alpasankhyak) leader within the BJP. 'Keshav Prasad Maurya should at least assert that he will be the party's Chief Ministerial face. Unfortunately, the way Keshav ji has been treated over the past 10 years, particularly as a PDA leader within the BJP, has been shameful,' he added.
SP MLA Questions Maurya's Political Standing
SP MLA Zahid Beg also weighed in, questioning whether Maurya even had the independence to speak his own mind. 'The public does not take Keshav Maurya seriously. Whatever he says, he should first reflect on his own position, the party he belongs to and the ministry he holds. If he does not have the freedom to sit or speak according to his own views, then what is there to say about him? Therefore, until the public takes him seriously, it would not be appropriate for us to comment on him,' Beg said.
Context: The 'Chalo Dilli' March and INDIA Bloc Politics
The 'Chalo Dilli' rally was billed by the INDIA Bloc as a show of strength against the Modi government, with organisers hoping to mobilise large numbers from across the country to Delhi's Ramlila Maidan. The BJP has consistently sought to frame such Opposition gatherings as failures, while the INDIA Bloc maintains that the marches signal growing public discontent. This war of words between the UP Deputy CM and the SP is consistent with the intensifying political battle in Uttar Pradesh, a state whose 80 Lok Sabha seats make it the single largest prize in any national election cycle. Maurya's remarks also arrive amid persistent speculation about intra-BJP succession politics in the state, a subtext that the SP has now moved explicitly into the public domain.
How voters in UP's crucial OBC and PDA constituencies read this exchange — and whether Maurya's position within the BJP hardens or softens — is likely to shape the political narrative in the state in the months ahead.