Did Rajasthan SI Recruitment 2021 Candidates Challenge High Court's Order?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal maneuver, candidates from the Rajasthan SI Recruitment-2021 are challenging a High Court ruling that annulled their selection. With an urgent appeal filed, they seek justice for what they believe is an unfair cancellation that impacts many who passed the exam honestly. Will they succeed in reinstating their positions?
Key Takeaways
- Appeal filed against cancellation of SI recruitment.
- Advocate Alankrita Sharma represents selected candidates.
- Single bench's ruling cited paper leaks as grounds for cancellation.
- Urgent hearing requested before the division bench.
- Relief granted to candidates who resigned from their jobs.
Jaipur, Sep 3 (NationPress) Candidates who were selected through the Rajasthan SI Recruitment-2021 have lodged an appeal with the division bench of the High Court, disputing the single bench’s ruling from August 28 that rendered the recruitment invalid.
The appeal was submitted by Advocate Alankrita Sharma, representing candidate Vikram Panwar and others.
The appellants asserted that the single bench’s ruling was flawed and negatively affected candidates who passed the examination with integrity and transparency.
They argued that since numerous candidates have already been chosen and appointed, it is unjust to nullify the entire recruitment process at this juncture.
A request for an urgent hearing has been made in the High Court, with the matter expected to be reviewed by the division bench, headed by Justice S.P. Sharma, on Monday, September 8.
Alongside the appeal, the candidates have filed a stay application, seeking immediate relief from the single bench’s order.
In the meantime, the single bench has taken suo motu cognizance of the irregularities in the RPSC during the SI examination process, registering the matter as public interest litigation (PIL).
This case has also been scheduled before the division bench for a hearing on September 10.
On August 28, Justice Sameer Jain of the single bench invalidated the SI recruitment via a comprehensive 202-page order, citing that the paper leak had extended statewide and was linked to the “Bluetooth gang,” with six RPSC members allegedly involved.
However, the court granted relief to those who had resigned from government positions to take on the role of SIs, instructing that they be reinstated to their original posts in accordance with service regulations.
Point of View
I believe this case raises critical questions about fairness and accountability in recruitment processes. The candidates’ appeal highlights the need for a thorough examination of the legal system’s responsiveness to such grievances, ensuring that those who have worked diligently are not unjustly penalized.
NationPress
03/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the appeal filed by Rajasthan SI candidates?
The appeal was prompted by a High Court single bench decision that annulled the SI recruitment process, affecting candidates who passed the examination.
Who filed the appeal on behalf of the candidates?
Advocate Alankrita Sharma filed the appeal on behalf of candidate Vikram Panwar and other selected candidates.
What was the basis of the single bench's cancellation order?
The single bench cited widespread paper leaks and irregularities as the basis for canceling the recruitment process.
When is the appeal expected to be heard?
The division bench is likely to hear the appeal on Monday, September 8.
What relief did the court provide to candidates who resigned from their jobs?
The court instructed that candidates who resigned to join as SIs should be reinstated to their original government positions.
