Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board autonomy: Harsimrat urges Fadnavis to scrap draft law

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board autonomy: Harsimrat urges Fadnavis to scrap draft law

Synopsis

For the second time in little over a year, the Maharashtra government's attempt to reshape the Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board has drawn sharp pushback — this time from Bathinda MP Harsimrat Kaur Badal, who has written directly to CM Fadnavis demanding the draft law be scrapped. With a gurmata already issued against the move and the SGPC aligned in opposition, the dispute is escalating into a full-blown religious autonomy flashpoint.

Key Takeaways

SAD leader and Bathinda MP Harsimrat Kaur Badal wrote to Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis on 26 June over the Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board draft law.
The proposed law would allow the state to fill the board with government nominees, bypassing Sikh community bodies including the SGPC and Hazuri Sachkhand Diwan .
In February 2024 , a similar amendment — allowing 12 of 17 board members to be government-nominated — was rolled back after mass protests.
The Takht's management has issued a gurmata (collective edict) opposing the repeal of the existing Act.
Badal is demanding the old Act be retained and the new draft law withdrawn to defuse community tension.

Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader and Bathinda MP Harsimrat Kaur Badal on Friday, 26 June wrote to Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, urging him to preserve the autonomous character of the Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board and withdraw a draft law that would allow the state government to pack the board with its own nominees. The appeal comes amid mounting tension within the global Sikh community over what critics describe as an attempt to strip a revered Sikh institution of its religious independence.

What the Draft Law Proposes

According to Badal, the new draft legislation seeks to fundamentally alter the composition and governance of the Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board — one of Sikhism's five supreme temporal seats, located in Nanded, Maharashtra. The proposed changes, she said, follow recommendations of a state-appointed committee and were drawn up without consulting the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) — the community's premier religious body — or the Hazuri Sachkhand Diwan.

Badal warned that the absence of prior consultation with Sikh bodies has fuelled a growing perception that the move is designed to end the board's autonomy. 'Sikhs worldwide also perceive this as an attempt to take complete control of the shrine to the detriment of the community,' she wrote in her letter.

Background: The February 2024 Amendment and Its Rollback

This is not the first time the Maharashtra government has sought to reshape the board's structure. In February 2024, the state amended the Act governing the shrine, clearing the way for the government to nominate 12 of the 17 board members directly. The amendment simultaneously reduced the SGPC's representation and abolished the roles of the Chief Khalsa Diwan and the Hazuri Sachkhand Diwan on the board altogether.

That move triggered massive protests from the SGPC and local Sikh organisations, forcing the Maharashtra government to roll back the amendment. However, according to Badal, the state now appears intent on reintroducing similar structural changes through an entirely new Act — effectively circumventing the community's earlier victory.

Community's Collective Stand

Badal emphasised that there is unanimity within the Sikh community that any decision affecting the maryada (code of conduct), management, and religious autonomy of Takht Sri Hazur Sahib must not be taken unilaterally by the state. She noted that the Takht's management has also issued a gurmata — a collective edict carrying religious authority — specifically opposing the Maharashtra government's decision to repeal the existing Act.

Notably, the issuance of a gurmata signals the highest level of institutional disapproval within Sikh religious governance, underscoring how seriously the community views the proposed changes.

What Harsimrat Badal Is Demanding

In her letter, Badal made two specific demands: first, that the old Act be allowed to remain in force; and second, that the new draft law be withdrawn entirely. She argued that honouring these demands would help defuse the tension that has built up within the Sikh community, which feels the Maharashtra government should refrain from interfering in their religious affairs.

'Accordingly, the old Act should be allowed to remain in force by withdrawing the new draft law. This will serve to diffuse the tension which has risen in the Sikh community, which feels the Maharashtra government should desist from interfering in their religious affairs,' Badal said.

The Maharashtra government is yet to formally respond to the letter. With the Sikh community's religious leadership, its premier institutional body, and now a sitting Member of Parliament aligned in opposition, the pressure on Chief Minister Fadnavis to reconsider the draft legislation is considerable.

Point of View

And now through an entirely new Act — suggest a pattern of persistence that the Sikh community finds difficult to read as anything other than deliberate. The issuance of a gurmata is not a routine protest; it is among the most serious institutional signals in Sikh religious governance. What is missing from the state's approach is any credible explanation of why a state-appointed committee's recommendations should override the expressed will of the SGPC and the Hazuri Sachkhand Diwan. Until Maharashtra provides that explanation transparently, the community's suspicion of political motivation will only deepen.
NationPress
26 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board controversy about?
The controversy centres on a Maharashtra government draft law that would allow the state to appoint government nominees to the Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board, potentially overriding the Sikh community's traditional control over the shrine in Nanded. Critics, including SAD's Harsimrat Kaur Badal, argue this threatens the board's religious autonomy.
What happened when Maharashtra tried to change the board's structure in 2024?
In February 2024, Maharashtra amended the Act governing the shrine to allow the government to directly nominate 12 of the 17 board members, while reducing SGPC representation and abolishing the roles of the Chief Khalsa Diwan and Hazuri Sachkhand Diwan. The amendment was withdrawn after massive protests by the SGPC and local Sikh organisations.
What is a gurmata and why does it matter here?
A gurmata is a collective edict issued by a Sikh Takht's management, carrying the highest level of religious authority within Sikh governance. The Takht Sri Hazur Sahib management has issued a gurmata against the Maharashtra government's decision to repeal the existing Act, signalling deep institutional opposition to the proposed changes.
What is Harsimrat Kaur Badal specifically asking Maharashtra to do?
Badal has asked Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to withdraw the new draft law entirely and allow the existing Act governing the Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board to remain in force. She argues this is necessary to preserve Sikh religious autonomy and ease the tension that has built up within the community.
Who is affected by the proposed changes to the Takht Sri Hazur Sahib Board?
The changes directly affect the Sikh community's control over one of its five supreme temporal seats. Bodies including the SGPC, the Chief Khalsa Diwan, and the Hazuri Sachkhand Diwan stand to lose representation, and Sikhs globally have expressed concern that the move could set a precedent for state interference in Sikh religious institutions.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 6 days ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 7 months ago
  5. 8 months ago
  6. 9 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google