What Sentencing Did the Second Accused Receive in the 2019 Mumbra Fake Currency Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant development, the NIA Special Court in Mumbai has sentenced a second accused in the 2019 Mumbra fake currency case, reinforcing efforts to combat counterfeit currency linked to terror financing. This conviction highlights the ongoing commitment of law enforcement agencies to uphold the integrity of India's financial systems.
Key Takeaways
- NIA Special Court in Mumbai sentences second accused in the 2019 Mumbra fake currency case.
- Convict Jasim received rigorous imprisonment and a fine.
- First accused Ishak Khan was sentenced earlier this year.
- Investigation led to substantial evidence against all three accused.
- Counterfeit currency linked to terror financing remains a priority for law enforcement.
New Delhi, July 31 (NationPress) The National Investigation Agency (NIA) Special Court in Mumbai has handed down a sentence to the second accused in the 2019 Mumbra fake currency case. The accused was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for his role in the distribution of high-quality Fake Indian Currency Notes (FICNs) within Maharashtra.
The individual, known as Jasim alias Wasim Salim Shaikh, received a sentence of five years, seven months, and ten days of rigorous imprisonment, along with a fine of Rs 10,000.
His arrest came after authorities recovered FICNs totaling Rs 82,000, all in Rs 500 denominations. During the trial, Jasim admitted his guilt. He is the second person to face conviction in this case; in May of this year, the first accused, Ishak Khan, was sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment and fined Rs 10,000.
The trial for the third accused, Radhakrishna Addappa, is still in progress. The events leading to this case date back to 2019 when the Mumbra police, acting on intelligence from the NIA, conducted a search that led to Jasim's arrest.
Investigations indicated that Jasim received the counterfeit currency from Addappa near a KSRTC Bus Stand in Gauribidnur, located in the Chikkaballapura district of Karnataka.
Both individuals were charged by the Mumbra Police in August 2019, and the NIA later took over the investigation, uncovering Ishak Khan's involvement, who was imprisoned in Kolkata for another crime.
Khan was reportedly the main coordinator responsible for delivering the FICNs to Jasim.
During the investigation, the agency discovered significant documentary and digital evidence, resulting in a supplementary chargesheet filed in January 2020 against all three defendants.
These convictions reflect the NIA’s commitment to combat the spread of counterfeit currency, which is frequently associated with larger networks of terror financing.
Point of View
It is crucial to recognize the National Investigation Agency's role in addressing counterfeit currency, which poses a serious threat to national security. The ongoing trials and convictions underscore the importance of proactive measures against financial crimes, ensuring the integrity of our economy while also contributing to broader efforts against terrorism.
NationPress
21/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the sentence given to the second accused in the Mumbra fake currency case?
The second accused, Jasim, was sentenced to five years, seven months, and ten days of rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs 10,000.
Who was the first accused in the case?
The first accused in the case was Ishak Khan, who was sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment and fined Rs 10,000 earlier this year.
What role did the NIA play in this case?
The NIA took over the investigation from the Mumbra Police, uncovering the involvement of multiple accused and gathering significant evidence against them.
Why is the fight against counterfeit currency important?
Combating counterfeit currency is crucial as it is often linked to larger terror financing networks, posing a threat to national security and the economy.
What evidence was found during the investigation?
The NIA uncovered substantial documentary and digital evidence that contributed to the charges against the accused individuals.
