Jantar Mantar protests were a youth festival, not a defeat: Shiv Sena(UBT)

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Jantar Mantar protests were a youth festival, not a defeat: Shiv Sena(UBT)

Synopsis

Shiv Sena(UBT)'s Saamana editorial reframes the Jantar Mantar youth protests as a 'vibrant festival against authoritarianism' — and turns the government's financial scrutiny of meal-drive organiser Muhammad Junaid into a pointed question: why can the state track a food drive but not the Pahalgam or Pulwama attackers?

Key Takeaways

Shiv Sena(UBT) accused UP Police of detaining activist Muhammad Junaid and his family members for up to 12 hours over a 35-day protest meal drive at Jantar Mantar .
The Saamana editorial alleged authorities ordered closure of hotels and food stalls in Connaught Place to cut off supplies to protesters.
The party drew a contrast with the government's failure to identify perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack ( 27 killed ) and the Pulwama attack ( 40 jawans killed ).
The editorial demanded public audits of BJP electoral funds, corporate donations, and funds collected during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The Thackeray camp called on Sonam Wangchuk and human rights advocates to join the campaign against alleged state oppression of protest organisers.

Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) on Tuesday launched a sharp offensive against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government and Uttar Pradesh Police, accusing them of running a politically motivated crackdown on activists Muhammad Junaid and Shadab Saifi, who organised food and water distribution for protesters at Jantar Mantar. The broadside came through an editorial in the party's mouthpiece Saamana, framing the recent youth demonstrations not as a failure but as a 'vibrant festival against authoritarianism.'

Targeting of Activists and Their Families

According to the Saamana editorial, UP Police have repeatedly detained Junaid and members of his extended family — including his parents, sister, and in-laws — for up to 12 hours at a stretch inside police stations. Investigators are reportedly attempting to trace the financial sources behind a 35-day relief operation that supplied meals to thousands of demonstrators daily at the protest site.

The editorial alleged that state machinery went further, reportedly ordering the closure of nearby hotels, street food stalls, and commercial food delivery services across the adjacent Connaught Place area in an apparent bid to starve out the protest. Despite suffering foot injuries, Junaid allegedly continued to coordinate meal distribution alongside local Sikh langars (community kitchens) operating round the clock.

The Party's Central Argument

The Thackeray camp argued that deploying the state apparatus to investigate a humanitarian meal drive amounts to a misuse of government power. The editorial drew a pointed contrast: 'The government failed to locate the terrorists behind the Pahalgam attack that killed 27 tourists, nor did it identify the source of the RDX used in the Pulwama attack that claimed 40 jawans,' it noted. 'Yet, the entire machinery is deployed to track who funded Junaid's meal drives simply because he wears a beard and a cap.'

The party further alleged that the central leadership has 'nothing to do with humanity or patriotism,' asserting that Junaid and his family are being harassed because the administration is 'baffled by the scale of the community-led relief effort.'

Financial Accountability Demanded of BJP

Turning the scrutiny back on the ruling party, the editorial demanded public audits and full transparency on government and political funds. Specifically, it called for an official inquiry into the origins and major donors behind thousands of crores deposited during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as into the BJP's electoral funds and corporate donations.

Youth Agitation Reframed as a Movement

Refusing to characterise the Jantar Mantar demonstrations as a setback, the Shiv Sena(UBT) editorial declared: 'In reality, the agitation at Jantar Mantar was not a crying movement, but a massive, vibrant festival of youth.' It noted that protesters showed 'no signs of pain on their faces' even after facing police lathi charges, pellet guns, spiked batons, and tear gas canisters.

Concluding the editorial, the Thackeray camp urged prominent voices — including climate activist Sonam Wangchuk and human rights advocates — to stand alongside Junaid, Saifi, and other grassroots organisers against what it described as state oppression. The call signals an intent to widen the coalition opposing the government's handling of the protests.

Point of View

The Thackeray camp is attempting to reframe a law-and-order story as a civil liberties and accountability issue. The demand for BJP electoral fund audits is a pivot that shifts the conversation from the protests themselves to the ruling party's own financial opacity. Whether this framing gains traction beyond the opposition base will depend on whether the government's scrutiny of Junaid produces any credible evidence of wrongdoing — or simply reinforces the narrative of disproportionate state response.
NationPress
28 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Shiv Sena(UBT)'s Saamana editorial say about the Jantar Mantar protests?
The Saamana editorial, published on Tuesday, described the Jantar Mantar youth demonstrations as a 'massive, vibrant festival of youth' against authoritarianism, rejecting the characterisation of the protests as a failure. It accused the BJP-led government and UP Police of a politically motivated crackdown on activists who organised food distribution for protesters.
Who are Muhammad Junaid and Shadab Saifi?
Muhammad Junaid and Shadab Saifi are activists who, according to the Saamana editorial, coordinated a 35-day relief operation supplying meals and water to thousands of protesters daily at Jantar Mantar. Junaid reportedly continued the effort despite foot injuries, working alongside local Sikh langars.
What specific actions did UP Police allegedly take against Muhammad Junaid?
According to the Saamana editorial, UP Police detained Junaid and members of his extended family — including his parents, sister, and in-laws — for up to 12 hours at a time. Investigators are reportedly trying to trace the financial sources behind his 35-day meal distribution operation.
What financial accountability did Shiv Sena(UBT) demand from the BJP?
The Saamana editorial demanded full public audits and transparency on the origins and major donors behind funds collected during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as an official inquiry into the BJP's electoral funds and corporate donations.
Why did the Saamana editorial mention the Pahalgam and Pulwama attacks?
The editorial used the two attacks — the Pahalgam attack that killed 27 tourists and the Pulwama attack that killed 40 jawans — to argue that the government had failed on genuine national security threats while deploying its full machinery to investigate a humanitarian food drive, which it characterised as a disproportionate and politically motivated use of state power.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 days ago
  2. 5 days ago
  3. 6 days ago
  4. 6 days ago
  5. 1 week ago
  6. 1 week ago
  7. 1 week ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google