Shivakumar fires back: Kumaraswamy's family amassed real estate wealth via PRR project

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Shivakumar fires back: Kumaraswamy's family amassed real estate wealth via PRR project

Synopsis

Karnataka's political temperature spiked as Deputy CM D.K. Shivakumar turned the tables on Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy, alleging his brother acquired properties worth crores in the PRR corridor by intimidating landowners — properties once registered at ₹7–10 lakh now valued at up to ₹50 crore. The Bidadi Township project has become the new battleground in the Congress–JD(S) war of words.

Key Takeaways

Shivakumar alleged on 16 May that H.D.
Kumaraswamy's brother acquired properties in the PRR corridor by intimidating landowners.
Properties in Dodda Gubbi and Chikka Gubbi were allegedly registered at ₹7–10 lakh and are now worth ₹25–50 crore .
Deve Gowda had earlier alleged Shivakumar owns 20,000 acres near Bengaluru and is pursuing business interests via the Bidadi Township project.
Shivakumar countered that Kumaraswamy himself had issued the original notification for the Bidadi project.
Shivakumar dismissed Kumaraswamy's call to avoid the 2% khata conversion fee , saying the Congress government is firmly in power.

Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar on Saturday, 16 May launched a pointed counter-attack against Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy, alleging that it was Kumaraswamy's own family — not Shivakumar — that had accumulated substantial wealth through real estate dealings, particularly in areas linked to the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) project in Bengaluru. The remarks came in direct response to allegations levelled by former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda over the proposed Bidadi Township project.

What Shivakumar Alleged

Speaking to reporters at the National Public School in Horamavu, Bengaluru, Shivakumar charged that Kumaraswamy's brother had properties registered under duress in the PRR corridor. 'Kumaraswamy's family has acquired wealth through real estate. His brother got properties registered by intimidating people in the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) area,' Shivakumar said.

He specifically named the Dodda Gubbi and Chikka Gubbi localities, claiming that properties were registered at values of ₹7 lakh, ₹8 lakh, and ₹10 lakh, and that those same parcels are now worth ₹25 crore, ₹30 crore, and even ₹50 crore. 'Ask people in Dodda Gubbi and Chikka Gubbi areas. They will tell you how people were intimidated,' he said.

The Bidadi Township Flashpoint

The spat centres on the Bidadi Township project on the outskirts of Bengaluru. Deve Gowda had alleged that Shivakumar was using the project to advance personal business interests, and — without naming him directly — claimed Shivakumar owns 20,000 acres in the region. Shivakumar turned the allegation back sharply, noting that it was Kumaraswamy himself who had issued the original notification for the Bidadi project. 'Didn't he say yesterday that the Bidadi township project should not be implemented? Who started that project? It was he himself who issued the notification,' Shivakumar said.

Khata Conversion Fee and Political Jabs

Shivakumar also responded to Kumaraswamy's advice to citizens to avoid paying the two per cent fee for khata conversion, with Kumaraswamy reportedly suggesting that a Janata Dal (Secular)–BJP government would soon return to power and waive the charge. Shivakumar dismissed this as political fantasy. 'Kumaraswamy keeps daydreaming. His government will not come to power. The Congress government is in office and is carrying out pro-people work,' he said.

He further challenged Kumaraswamy to address the hike in petrol, diesel, and cooking gas prices — issues, Shivakumar argued, that the Union Minister had once commented on but now avoids. 'Other than criticising others and issuing statements against them, he has no other work,' Shivakumar said.

Governance Record and Deve Gowda Retort

Shivakumar used the occasion to highlight what he described as his own administrative record: providing drinking water, correcting property records, and creating five new corporations for improved governance in Bengaluru city. He claimed that even BJP leaders had appreciated his work and that he was actively seeking their suggestions on municipal reforms.

On Deve Gowda's remark that Shivakumar was 'dreaming of a transfer of power on his birthday', the Deputy Chief Minister offered a cryptic rebuttal: 'Let him first remember what his son did regarding the transfer of power. After that, he can speak about other matters.' The comment is widely seen as a reference to the political circumstances under which Kumaraswamy had previously assumed and ceded the Chief Ministership of Karnataka.

What This Signals

This is the latest episode in a long-running rivalry between the Indian National Congress (INC)-led Karnataka government and the Janata Dal (Secular)–BJP alliance at the Centre. With Bengaluru's real estate and infrastructure projects increasingly drawn into political crossfire, the Bidadi Township and PRR corridor disputes are set to remain contested terrain in the run-up to future electoral cycles.

Point of View

000-acres allegation before it gains traction — but it also drags the PRR corridor's murky land acquisition history back into public view, which is uncomfortable for more than one political family. What is missing from both sides is a credible, independent audit of land dealings around Bengaluru's infrastructure corridors, where political connections and property windfalls have long overlapped. The Bidadi Township dispute is symptomatic of a broader Karnataka pattern: major urban infrastructure projects becoming proxies for factional score-settling rather than genuine policy debate. Voters in Bengaluru's periphery, who live with the consequences of these land deals, are the ones least heard in this exchange.
NationPress
4 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did D.K. Shivakumar allege against H.D. Kumaraswamy?
Deputy CM D.K. Shivakumar alleged that Kumaraswamy's brother acquired properties in Bengaluru's Peripheral Ring Road corridor by intimidating landowners, with plots registered at ₹7–10 lakh now worth ₹25–50 crore. He made these remarks on 16 May while responding to media questions at Horamavu, Bengaluru.
What is the Bidadi Township project controversy?
The Bidadi Township project is a proposed urban development on Bengaluru's outskirts. Former PM H.D. Deve Gowda alleged that Shivakumar was pursuing personal business interests through the project and claimed Shivakumar owns 20,000 acres in the region. Shivakumar countered that Kumaraswamy himself had originally issued the notification for the project.
Why is the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) project politically sensitive?
The PRR is a major Bengaluru infrastructure corridor where land values have surged dramatically. Shivakumar alleged that properties in Dodda Gubbi and Chikka Gubbi were acquired at suppressed prices through intimidation and are now worth crores, making the corridor a flashpoint in the Congress–JD(S) political rivalry.
What did Shivakumar say about the khata conversion fee?
Shivakumar dismissed Kumaraswamy's advice to citizens not to pay the 2% khata conversion fee, calling it a 'daydream.' He asserted that the Congress government is firmly in office and delivering pro-people schemes, and that a JD(S)–BJP government returning to power is not a realistic prospect.
What was Deve Gowda's role in this political dispute?
Former PM H.D. Deve Gowda, father of Union Minister Kumaraswamy, had criticised Shivakumar over the Bidadi Township project, alleging business interests and claiming Shivakumar owns 20,000 acres near Bengaluru. Shivakumar responded by asking Deve Gowda to first reflect on 'what his son did regarding the transfer of power' before commenting on others.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 days ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 9 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google