SIR is an Election Commission process, not BJP's: Telangana BJP chief
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Telangana Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President R. Rao on 5 October 2026 defended the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, stating it is an Election Commission of India (ECI) initiative — not a BJP-driven exercise — designed solely to remove dead, duplicate, and ineligible voters from electoral rolls. His remarks came in response to Opposition leaders, including All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi, who have publicly opposed SIR amid a nationwide controversy.
What the Telangana BJP chief said
Rao directly challenged Owaisi and other Opposition figures, arguing their criticism was misdirected. Rao said, 'AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi and other leaders who are opposing the SIR process should know that it is initiated by the Election Commission of India, and not the BJP.'
He further said, 'It is a process not introduced by the BJP. It is an Election Commission process. It was also carried out during the Congress' rule. They did not oppose it then, so why are they opposing it now?'
Rao also pointed to Kerala as an example, noting that the Indian National Congress (Congress) won elections in the state even after SIR was conducted — countering claims that the exercise systematically favours the BJP.
BJP's broader counter-argument
Elaborating on the purpose of SIR, Rao said the process is meant to delete entries of deceased voters, duplicate registrations, foreign nationals, and voters who have relocated — describing it as a routine housekeeping exercise. 'There is no illegality; there is nothing to object to; there should be no objection in this regard,' he said.
He also took a swipe at the Opposition's electoral track record, alleging that Congress and the INDIA Bloc habitually blame either the Election Commission or Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) whenever they lose elections. He added that BJP has been in power for 12 years because, in his assessment, 'people have lost faith in the Congress and the INDIA Bloc.'
The Opposition's case against SIR
Opposition parties have pushed back hard, staging protests at multiple locations across the country, including at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi, on Sunday. They allege that over 13 crore names were dropped from the draft electoral rolls under the SIR exercise and that the process could disproportionately benefit the BJP.
Several Opposition leaders have also alleged that the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) has compromised the fairness of the electoral process and demanded the SIR exercise be withdrawn entirely. The ruling BJP has rejected all such allegations as baseless.
Context and what's at stake
The SIR controversy has escalated into a significant political flashpoint ahead of upcoming electoral cycles. Critics argue that large-scale deletions from voter rolls — even if procedurally valid — disproportionately affect marginalised communities, who are more likely to be flagged as 'duplicate' or 'relocated' voters. The Election Commission has maintained that SIR is a lawful and necessary process to keep rolls accurate.
With both sides entrenched, pressure is likely to mount on the Election Commission to clarify its methodology and release granular data on which voter categories were removed and from which constituencies.