SP fires back at BJP's Nitin Nabin: 'All mafias stand with CM Yogi'

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
SP fires back at BJP's Nitin Nabin: 'All mafias stand with CM Yogi'

Synopsis

The BJP-SP mafia-labelling war has gone fully symmetrical. The SP's response — naming specific districts and communities linked to the BJP — signals the party is done playing defence over Azam Khan and is pivoting to offence ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh elections. The real contest is over who controls the law-and-order narrative in India's most electorally decisive state.

Key Takeaways

BJP President Nitin Nabin accused the Samajwadi Party of vote-bank politics by backing Azam Khan , who is in judicial custody in a money laundering case.
SP MLA Sangram Yadav alleged that mafias from Varanasi , Jaunpur , Ambedkar Nagar , Deoria and Allahabad are associated with the BJP and seen with CM Yogi Adityanath .
Yadav cited an Allahabad High Court query on weapon licences and an alleged display of 500 weapons on Dussehra .
SP MLA Jai Kishan Sahu said voters will respond in the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections .
BJP MP Prakash Pal invoked Atiq Ahmed and Mukhtar Ansari as examples of SP-era criminal influence.

The Samajwadi Party (SP) on Saturday, 7 November sharply counter-attacked Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President Nitin Nabin after he criticised the SP over its support for party leader Azam Khan, currently in judicial custody in connection with a money laundering case. SP legislators accused the BJP of harbouring its own criminal elements, asserting that 'all mafias and goons are associated with the BJP and are seen alongside Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.'

What Triggered the Exchange

The row erupted after Nabin accused the SP leadership of pursuing vote-bank politics by standing with people linked to criminal elements. 'These are the same people who gave Uttar Pradesh the identity of One District, One Mafia. During the Samajwadi Party government, every district had a strongman, and they used these figures to gain and maintain power,' Nabin said, responding to SP chief Akhilesh Yadav's claims of injustice against Khan.

SP's Rebuttal: Naming Districts and Communities

SP MLA Sangram Yadav hit back with pointed questions, challenging the BJP to define who qualifies as a mafia. 'Can't you see who the mafia from Varanasi is sitting with? Who the mafias from Jaunpur, Ambedkar Nagar, Deoria and Allahabad are associated with? Do you only see PDA members as mafias?' he said. Yadav further cited a case in which the Allahabad High Court had questioned how certain individuals obtained weapon licences, alleging that one of them displayed 500 weapons on Dussehra. 'It is the BJP which is the party of mafias, goons and corruption,' he claimed.

SP Eyes 2027 Polls as the Real Verdict

SP MLA Jai Kishan Sahu framed the controversy in terms of the upcoming Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections in 2027, asserting that voters will respond at the ballot box. 'The people of Uttar Pradesh are watching everything closely. Voters would give a strong reply in the 2027 Assembly elections and elect an Akhilesh Yadav-led government,' Sahu said, also alleging that under both the Central and state governments, young people are searching for jobs while students demanding employment are being met with police batons.

BJP Stands Firm, Cites Atiq Ahmed and Mukhtar Ansari

BJP MP Prakash Pal backed Nabin's remarks, invoking the names of now-deceased gangster-politicians Atiq Ahmed and Mukhtar Ansari as evidence of SP-era lawlessness. 'There used to be at least one mafia in every district, whose muscle power was used to illegally occupy people's land and properties,' Pal claimed. He alleged that judges had refused to hear cases involving Atiq Ahmed and that a pond was reportedly built inside jail for Mukhtar Ansari. Pal added that under Chief Minister Adityanath's government such mafias have been completely eliminated, though this claim is his own and not independently verified.

The Broader Political Context

The exchange is the latest flare-up in a long-running BJP-SP battle over law and order narratives in Uttar Pradesh, India's most populous state and a pivotal electoral battleground. With Azam Khan remaining a polarising figure, both parties are seeking to define the mafia label on their own terms ahead of 2027. The SP's counter-offensive — shifting from defending Khan to attacking BJP's own associations — signals an increasingly aggressive pre-election posture from the opposition.

Point of View

And that symmetry is itself the story. The SP's tactic of naming districts and communities is designed to neutralise the BJP's law-and-order brand — the centrepiece of Yogi Adityanath's political identity — rather than defend Azam Khan directly. Whether this pivot lands depends on whether voters in 2027 see it as a credible counter-narrative or mere deflection. Every exchange like this is less about Azam Khan and more about who controls the criminalisation-versus-governance story heading into India's most consequential state contest.
NationPress
7 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Samajwadi Party hit back at BJP's Nitin Nabin?
BJP President Nitin Nabin accused the SP of pursuing vote-bank politics by backing SP leader Azam Khan, who is in judicial custody in a money laundering case. The SP responded by alleging that the BJP itself shelters criminals, naming specific districts in Uttar Pradesh as examples.
What is Azam Khan currently accused of?
Azam Khan, a senior Samajwadi Party leader, is currently in judicial custody in connection with a money laundering case. His detention has been cited by BJP leaders as evidence of SP links to criminal elements.
What did SP MLA Sangram Yadav specifically allege against the BJP?
Sangram Yadav alleged that mafias from Varanasi, Jaunpur, Ambedkar Nagar, Deoria, and Allahabad are associated with the BJP and seen alongside CM Yogi Adityanath. He also cited an Allahabad High Court query on weapon licences and a reported display of 500 weapons on Dussehra.
How has the BJP responded to the SP's counter-attack?
BJP MP Prakash Pal backed Nabin and cited the cases of Atiq Ahmed and Mukhtar Ansari as evidence of SP-era criminal influence in Uttar Pradesh. He claimed that under CM Yogi Adityanath such elements have been completely eliminated, though this claim is attributed to him alone.
What is at stake ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh elections?
Both parties are contesting the law-and-order narrative that will be central to the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections. SP MLA Jai Kishan Sahu said voters will respond by electing an Akhilesh Yadav-led government, while the BJP is defending CM Adityanath's governance record.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 hours ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 5 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google