Will the Supreme Court Address Stray Dog Management Tomorrow?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Supreme Court to hear case on stray dog management.
- Chief Secretaries of all states required to appear in person.
- Only a few states have submitted compliance affidavits.
- Failure to comply may lead to coercive measures.
- The issue affects both public safety and national reputation.
New Delhi, Nov 2 (NationPress) The Supreme Court is set to deliberate on Monday (November 3) regarding the suo moto case related to the management of stray dogs throughout the nation. Chief Secretaries from all states and Union Territories—excluding West Bengal and Telangana—have been mandated to appear in person.
A special bench, consisting of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and N.V. Anjaria, will address the case, having previously expressed dissatisfaction with the ongoing non-compliance exhibited by numerous states and UTs regarding the apex court's directives on the implementation of the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023.
During the last hearing on October 27, the court conveyed its strong disapproval of most state governments' failure to submit compliance affidavits, despite explicit orders issued on August 22.
The apex court pointed out that only West Bengal, Telangana, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) had complied by submitting their affidavits.
“Haven’t the officers been following news? Even if they are not served, the affidavit should have been filed. All Chief Secretaries must be present on November 3,” remarked the Justice Nath-led bench.
On October 31, the Supreme Court dismissed Solicitor General Tushar Mehta's appeal to permit virtual attendance for the Chief Secretaries, insisting instead that they must appear personally before the court.
The Supreme Court had previously instructed all states and UTs to file affidavits that detail the actions taken to enforce the ABC Rules, including sterilization initiatives, vaccination programs, and the creation of animal shelters and pounds.
The court also cautioned that coercive measures and costs could be imposed for persistent non-compliance. This matter, which has attracted multiple intervention requests from resident welfare associations and individuals, is under close scrutiny by the Supreme Court, which underlined that the issue pertains not just to public safety but also to the country’s international reputation.
The court noted, “Continuous incidents are occurring, and the country’s image is adversely affected in the eyes of foreign nations. We are also seeing news reports.”