Tripura youth Lesongit Reang: 'Never knew Amir Shokeen before racial abuse'

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Tripura youth Lesongit Reang: 'Never knew Amir Shokeen before racial abuse'

Synopsis

The Tripura youth at the centre of the Amir Shokeen racial abuse controversy has directly contradicted the content creator's claim that the video was scripted and the two were acquainted. Lesongit Reang says he had never seen Shokeen before the incident, while Tipra Motha chief Pradyot Barman demands a channel ban and legal action across states — escalating pressure on the accused beyond a mere apology.

Key Takeaways

Lesongit Reang , the Tripura youth in the viral racial abuse video, says he had never met content creator Amir Shokeen before the incident.
Reang suggested the accused and companions may have been under the influence of alcohol during the incident.
Tipra Motha Party founder Pradyot Bikram Manikya Deb Barman demanded Shokeen's channel be banned and strict legal action taken beyond an apology.
An FIR has already been registered in Tripura ; Barman called for further proceedings in the state.
Shokeen's claim on Facebook that the video was scripted and the victim was known to him has been directly refuted by Reang.

Lesongit Reang, the youth from Tripura who was allegedly subjected to racial abuse and harassment in a widely circulated video, on Saturday, 24 October 2026, stated categorically that he had no prior acquaintance with the accused — content creator Amir Shokeen — and had never encountered him before the incident. The disclosure directly contradicts Shokeen's earlier claim that the video was scripted and that the man in it was known to him.

Victim's Account of the Incident

Speaking to reporters, Reang said: 'Everyone should know what happened to me that day. First of all, I did not know him (Amir Shokeen) beforehand. I know one of his friends, but I did not know him, and neither had I seen him before.'

Reang also suggested that the accused and his companions may have been under the influence of alcohol at the time. 'At that time, they may also have been under the influence of alcohol...and as you saw in the video, they said those things to me...one cannot say such things to someone, especially to an unknown person. I was hurt (due to the remarks), but there were a lot of people at that time so I could not do anything, not even object,' he said.

Tipra Motha Chief Demands Strict Action

Pradyot Bikram Manikya Deb Barman, founder of the Tipra Motha Party (TMP), accompanied Reang and called for strict legal action against Shokeen, asserting that an apology alone is insufficient.

'I believe that making videos that hurt the sentiments of people from any region is completely unacceptable. If you want to make money by hurting or mocking someone or commenting on the physical appearance of people from a particular state, you should not only be punished, but your channel should also be banned, and you should be blocked,' Barman said.

He further questioned the integrity of such content, asking: 'Won't it weaken the nation to call citizens of our own land by such names?' He urged people across India to unite with mutual respect.

FIR in Tripura, Further Legal Action Sought

Barman confirmed that an FIR has already been registered in Tripura and called for Shokeen to face action under the state's jurisdiction as well. 'So that Shokeen gets to witness the culture of Tripura,' he said. He also made clear that a post-facto apology does not mitigate the offence: 'Apologising after committing a mistake in the fear of going to jail doesn't reduce your crime.'

Shokeen's Contradictory Response

Following the major social media backlash triggered by the viral video, Amir Shokeen issued an apology. However, in a Facebook post, he had claimed the video was scripted and that the victim was known to him — a claim Reang has now directly refuted. Shokeen's contradiction has drawn additional criticism and deepened scrutiny of his conduct.

This incident has reignited a broader national debate on racial discrimination, Northeast India representation, and accountability for social media content creators who monetise offensive material at the expense of marginalised communities. Authorities in Tripura are expected to pursue the registered FIR, with the TMP pressing for parallel legal proceedings.

Point of View

Amplified and monetised on digital platforms. What makes this case significant is the victim's direct refutation of the 'scripted video' defence, which stripped away the one plausible legal buffer Shokeen had constructed. The involvement of Pradyot Barman and the Tipra Motha Party signals this will have political legs in Tripura. The deeper question mainstream coverage has largely missed: India's content creator economy has no effective accountability mechanism for racially offensive material, and FIRs alone have historically not deterred repeat behaviour. The demand for channel bans is a blunt instrument, but without platform-level enforcement, it may be the only pressure point that works.
NationPress
24 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Lesongit Reang and what happened to him?
Lesongit Reang is a youth from Tripura who was allegedly subjected to racial abuse and harassment by content creator Amir Shokeen, as shown in a video that went viral on social media. Reang has stated he had no prior acquaintance with Shokeen and was hurt by the remarks but was unable to respond at the time due to the crowd present.
What did Amir Shokeen say in his defence?
Amir Shokeen apologised after facing major backlash from the viral video. In a Facebook post, he claimed the video was scripted and that the man featured in it was known to him — a claim that Lesongit Reang has directly contradicted.
What legal action has been taken against Amir Shokeen?
An FIR has been registered against Amir Shokeen in Tripura. Tipra Motha Party chief Pradyot Bikram Manikya Deb Barman has also called for further legal action to be pursued in Tripura and demanded that Shokeen's social media channel be banned.
What did Tipra Motha chief Pradyot Barman demand?
Pradyot Bikram Manikya Deb Barman demanded strict punishment for Shokeen, including a ban on his channel and blocking of his social media presence. He said an apology made out of fear of imprisonment does not reduce the severity of the crime.
Why is the Amir Shokeen racial abuse case significant?
The case has reignited debate about racial discrimination against people from Northeast India and the accountability of social media content creators who profit from offensive content. It is significant because the victim's testimony directly contradicts the accused's defence, strengthening the legal case against Shokeen.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 8 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. 2 days ago
  4. 2 days ago
  5. 2 days ago
  6. 2 days ago
  7. 3 days ago
  8. 3 days ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google