Vijay's Nominations for TN Assembly Elections Approved After Affidavit Corrections

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Vijay's Nominations for TN Assembly Elections Approved After Affidavit Corrections

Synopsis

In a significant turn of events, actor-turned-politician Vijay has successfully amended discrepancies in his nomination papers, securing his candidacy for both Perambur and Tiruchirappalli East in the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections.

Key Takeaways

Vijay successfully amended his nomination papers for the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections.
Discrepancies related to criminal cases and age were corrected.
His nominations received approval despite opposition from rival parties.
Other influential candidates also had their nominations accepted.
This incident highlights the importance of transparency in political processes.

Chennai, April 7 (NationPress) The actor-turned-politician Vijay, head of the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), has achieved approval for his nomination papers from both the Perambur constituency in Chennai and the Tiruchirappalli East constituency for the upcoming 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly elections. This follows the submission of amended affidavits that addressed earlier inconsistencies.

Vijay initially filed his nomination for Perambur at Dr. Ambedkar Government Arts College in Vyasarpadi on March 30, and subsequently submitted documents for Tiruchirappalli East on April 2.

However, a review of his affidavits uncovered notable discrepancies, which quickly became a topic of considerable discussion in political and social spheres.

In his Tiruchirappalli East nomination, Vijay disclosed two criminal cases against him. Conversely, the affidavit submitted for Perambur indicated that there were no pending criminal cases.

Moreover, his age was reported differently across the two submissions—52 years for Perambur and 51 years for Tiruchirappalli East—prompting concerns regarding the validity of the information presented.

The inconsistencies ignited a flurry of conversation on social media, with some analysts warning that the nomination for Perambur could be rejected if amendments weren't made swiftly.

In response, Vijay filed a revised affidavit for the Perambur constituency on April 4. This updated document reconciled the disclosures with those made in the Tiruchirappalli East filing, including the criminal case details.

One case is associated with a protest incident in Kolathur, where a large assembly allegedly caused public disturbances, leading to police action at Peravallur station. The other case relates to a security-related altercation in Madurai on August 21 of the previous year, where injuries occurred during a public event, resulting in a formal complaint.

The revised affidavit also corrected his age to 51 years in the Perambur submission.

The updated documents were presented to the Returning Officer by party representatives, including legal advisors.

Election officials confirmed that since the errors were rectified within the allowed timeframe, there were no grounds for rejection.

Despite objections raised by the DMK and some independent candidates during the review, Vijay’s nominations from both constituencies were ultimately accepted.

Meanwhile, the nominations of other significant leaders, including Chief Minister M. K. Stalin from Kolathur, Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin from Chepauk-Thiruvallikeni, and BJP leader Nainar Nagendran from Sattur, were also approved, along with numerous other notable candidates across the state.

Point of View

This situation underscores the complexities of electoral politics, especially concerning transparency and accountability among candidates. The swift rectification of discrepancies in Vijay's affidavits demonstrates a commitment to comply with electoral regulations, yet raises questions about the initial oversight.
NationPress
2 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What discrepancies were found in Vijay's affidavits?
Vijay's affidavits contained inconsistencies regarding the presence of criminal cases and his age, with different ages reported for each constituency.
How did Vijay resolve the issues with his nominations?
Vijay submitted a revised affidavit that corrected the discrepancies, aligning the information across both nominations.
Was there any opposition to Vijay's nominations?
Yes, objections were raised by the DMK and some independent candidates during the scrutiny process, but his nominations were still accepted.
When did Vijay submit his nominations?
Vijay filed his nomination for Perambur on March 30 and for Tiruchirappalli East on April 2.
What other significant nominations were accepted?
Nominations of key leaders, including Chief Minister M. K. Stalin and Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, were also accepted.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 months ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google