Did History-Sheeter 'Karukka' Vinoth Really Try to Throw a Slipper at the Judge?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bizarre courtroom incident, history-sheeter 'Karukka' Vinoth attempted to throw a slipper at a judge just a day after receiving a 10-year prison sentence for a petrol bomb attack. This shocking act raises questions about courtroom security and the behavior of repeat offenders.
Key Takeaways
- Vinoth attempted to throw a slipper at the judge.
- He was sentenced to 10 years for a petrol bomb attack.
- Courtroom security measures are under review.
- Vinoth has a history of criminal offenses.
- Future hearings will be conducted via video conferencing.
Chennai, Nov 13 (NationPress) In a shocking turn of events on the Madras High Court premises, history-sheeter ‘Karukka’ Vinoth made an attempt to throw his footwear at the presiding judge during a separate criminal case on Thursday, merely a day after being handed a 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence for his involvement in the 2023 petrol bomb attack outside Raj Bhavan.
Vinoth, known for his repeated offenses with numerous cases against him, was convicted on Wednesday by the Special Court for National Investigation Agency (NIA) cases in Poonamallee.
On October 25, 2023, Judge T. Chandrasekaran found him guilty of launching a petrol bomb at the Raj Bhavan Gate-I.
In light of the severity of the attack and his prior criminal history, the court imposed a ten-year rigorous imprisonment sentence.
On Thursday, Vinoth was brought from Central Prison, Puzhal to the Sixth Additional Sessions Court at the Madras High Court.
He was scheduled to face trial in another case concerning a petrol bomb attack on a Tasmac outlet in T. Nagar, which occurred prior to the attack on Raj Bhavan.
Sources from the court revealed that Vinoth appeared increasingly agitated upon entering the courtroom of Sixth Additional Sessions Judge Pandiarajan. As the proceedings commenced, he abruptly declared that the ten-year sentence he received for the Raj Bhavan incident was “too severe” and insisted he was a victim of unfair targeting.
Before court personnel and police could intervene, he removed a slipper and attempted to throw it towards the judge.
The footwear failed to reach the judge's bench, and vigilant police officers swiftly subdued Vinoth, escorting him out of the courtroom.
This unexpected outburst caused a moment of panic in the courtroom, but thankfully, no injuries were reported.
Following the incident, Judge Pandiarajan expressed his disappointment regarding Vinoth's behavior and directed prison authorities to implement strict security measures for future hearings.
The court ruled that Vinoth must be presented in all upcoming proceedings via video conferencing to prevent further disruptions or security issues.
Officials indicated that an internal report would be generated to investigate the security breach, and additional charges may be considered based on the findings of the inquiry.
As the T. Nagar petrol bomb case remains ongoing, Vinoth is set to begin serving his ten-year sentence for the attack on Raj Bhavan.
Point of View
I believe this incident underscores the importance of courtroom security and the challenges faced by the judicial system in handling repeat offenders. The audacity displayed by Vinoth not only threatens the integrity of legal proceedings but also raises critical questions regarding the measures in place to ensure safety within courtrooms.
NationPress
14/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the reason for Vinoth's sentencing?
Vinoth was sentenced to ten years for his role in a petrol bomb attack outside Raj Bhavan.
What incident occurred in the courtroom?
Vinoth attempted to throw a slipper at the judge during a separate criminal case.
What measures will be taken for future hearings?
The court has ordered Vinoth to appear via video conferencing to avoid further disruptions.
What is the status of the T. Nagar petrol bomb case?
The T. Nagar petrol bomb case is still under trial.
Who presided over Vinoth's sentencing?
Judge T. Chandrasekaran presided over the case.
