Eureka Forbes gets ₹273 crore GST notice from Uttar Pradesh for FY23
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Eureka Forbes Limited, the Mumbai-headquartered health and hygiene products company, has received a show-cause notice from the Uttar Pradesh GST department proposing a total tax demand of ₹273.40 crore for the financial year 2022-23. The notice was received after office hours on 25 September, with the company disclosing it to stock exchanges on 28 September — the first working day after receipt.
What the Notice Demands
The show-cause notice was issued by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-1, Lucknow, under Section 73(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It alleges a core GST liability of ₹149.21 crore, to which interest of ₹109.27 crore and a penalty of ₹14.92 crore have been added, bringing the total proposed demand to ₹273.40 crore.
Why Eureka Forbes Is Contesting It
In a regulatory filing, Eureka Forbes argued that the demand appears to have been calculated using pan-India financial data drawn from its audited FY23 financial statements, without establishing the corresponding transaction-level tax liability specifically attributable to its Uttar Pradesh GST registration. The company maintained that the notice 'is devoid of merits, not sustainable on facts or in law or in procedure' and said it intends to contest the notice comprehensively within the prescribed timelines.
Eureka Forbes also stated that it does not foresee any material impact on its financial position, business operations, or other activities as a result of the notice. This distinction — between a show-cause notice and a confirmed demand — is significant: a show-cause notice initiates proceedings but does not constitute a final tax order.
Market Reaction
Shares of Eureka Forbes closed at ₹361.90 on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) on the day of the disclosure, down ₹8.65 or 2.33% from the previous close. It is unclear whether the decline was directly linked to the GST notice or broader market movement.
Broader Context
This notice is part of a wider pattern of state GST authorities issuing retrospective demands to large consumer goods companies, often leveraging consolidated financial filings to estimate state-level liabilities. Critics of such notices argue that using pan-India data without transaction-level attribution can result in inflated demands that do not reflect actual state-wise tax obligations. Eureka Forbes's pushback on procedural and factual grounds mirrors the approach taken by several other listed companies facing similar notices in recent years. The company's response is due within the timelines prescribed under the Uttar Pradesh GST Act.