Darren Lehmann disputes Khawaja's 2018 sandpaper scandal claims

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Darren Lehmann disputes Khawaja's 2018 sandpaper scandal claims

Synopsis

Eight years after Sandpapergate shook Australian cricket, the scandal is back — and messier than ever. Usman Khawaja's book claims the entire dressing room knew; Darren Lehmann, the coach who resigned in the fallout, says that is simply not true. With Cricket Australia standing by its original findings, the question of who really knew what in Cape Town in March 2018 remains unanswered.

Key Takeaways

Darren Lehmann has disputed Usman Khawaja 's claim that the full Australian squad knew about the 2018 sandpaper plan in Cape Town .
Khawaja alleged in interviews tied to his book Sabr that 'not the batters, not the bowlers, not the staff — all of us' were aware.
Lehmann acknowledged that ball tampering had been a feature of international cricket for 150 years but drew a distinction between general awareness and specific knowledge of Bancroft's method.
Cameron Bancroft , Steve Smith , and David Warner were suspended following the original scandal; Lehmann stood down as head coach.
Cricket Australia reiterated confidence in its original integrity findings but said it remained open to new relevant information.
Lehmann revealed Khawaja had not contacted him before making the allegations public, and described the renewed scrutiny as emotionally difficult for those involved.

Former Australia head coach Darren Lehmann has directly contested claims by batter Usman Khawaja that the entire Australian dressing room was aware of the ball-tampering scheme during the March 2018 Cape Town Test, saying knowledge of the specific sandpaper plot was far more limited than Khawaja has alleged. The dispute has reignited one of cricket's most damaging controversies, eight years after the scandal first broke.

What Khawaja Alleged

Khawaja, in a series of interviews tied to the release of his new book Sabr, told Sydney Morning Herald that Australia's use of sandpaper was not an isolated act and that the plan had been known throughout the squad. 'Not the batters, not the bowlers, not the staff. All of us,' Khawaja was quoted as saying. He also claimed he had proposed that the team take collective responsibility once Cameron Bancroft was exposed on the field.

Lehmann's Counter and Key Distinctions

Speaking to ABC Sport's Summer Grandstand, Lehmann drew a sharp distinction between general awareness that ball tampering occurs in international cricket and specific knowledge of the sandpaper method Bancroft employed. 'I don't think everyone would have known (about the use of sandpaper). You do know ball tampering is going on because it's been happening for 150 years. It's just how it's being done, and how you would know to that extent? That's an individual case by case, to be fair. I can only speak to what I know, and I know ball tampering was a big part of the game of cricket. Now it is obsolete. That doesn't make it right either, but that's the case, and we paid a heavy price for that,' Lehmann said.

On Khawaja's claim that he had suggested collective responsibility, Lehmann said he had no recollection of any such conversation, noting that the touring squad was spread across separate dressing rooms and that he was occupied with meetings involving Cricket Australia at the time. 'I don't remember that. There were two change rooms obviously, and there were meetings going on everywhere. To be perfectly honest I was in meetings with Cricket Australia a lot,' he said.

The Scandal That Changed Australian Cricket

The Cape Town episode in March 2018 remains among the most consequential episodes in Australian cricket history. Bancroft was caught on camera using sandpaper to roughen one side of the ball during the third Test against South Africa. The fallout was swift: Bancroft, then-captain Steve Smith, and then-vice-captain David Warner each received lengthy bans from Cricket Australia, and Lehmann subsequently stood down from his head coaching role. This latest round of public claims marks the third major re-examination of the events, following the original investigation and an extensive media scrutiny during Australia's series in South Africa the previous month.

Cricket Australia's Position

Cricket Australia reiterated confidence in its original investigation, with a spokesperson saying the governing body had properly considered all relevant information brought to its attention. 'There has been a great deal of speculation in the eight years since the 2018 Cape Town Test, including extensive media coverage throughout last month's series in South Africa,' the spokesperson said. The governing body added that it remained open to any additional relevant information, while standing by the conclusions of its integrity process.

Personal Toll and Lehmann's Frustration

Lehmann spoke candidly about the emotional cost of the renewed scrutiny, describing the original period following the scandal as one of extreme personal difficulty. 'It was a really tough week, two weeks, at that time going through the process and talking to all the relevant parties. I was in a really dark place for a period of time where for four months I didn't leave my house,' he said. He also noted that Khawaja had not contacted him before making the allegations public — a point that clearly added to his frustration. 'I haven't spoken to Usman, he hasn't texted me or rang me. That's just the way it is,' Lehmann stated, adding that the latest claims had brought back difficult memories for those directly involved in the 2018 episode. Whether Khawaja's book prompts any formal review by Cricket Australia remains to be seen.

Point of View

Not the broader culture of rule-bending that made the 2018 incident possible. Cricket Australia's posture — 'we remain comfortable with our findings' while nominally welcoming new information — is a holding position, not a resolution. The deeper question the coverage continues to sidestep is whether the original investigation was ever designed to find systemic answers, or only to identify individual culprits.
NationPress
7 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Usman Khawaja claim about the 2018 Australia sandpaper scandal?
Khawaja alleged, in interviews tied to his book Sabr, that the entire Australian touring party — batters, bowlers, and support staff — was aware of the sandpaper ball-tampering plan during the March 2018 Cape Town Test. He also claimed he had proposed the team take collective responsibility after Cameron Bancroft was caught on camera.
How did Darren Lehmann respond to Khawaja's allegations?
Lehmann disputed the claim that everyone in the dressing room knew about the specific use of sandpaper, saying knowledge of Bancroft's exact method was limited. He acknowledged that ball tampering had been part of international cricket for 150 years but insisted he could only speak to what he personally knew.
What were the consequences of the 2018 Cape Town ball-tampering scandal?
Cameron Bancroft, then-captain Steve Smith, and then-vice-captain David Warner each received lengthy suspensions from Cricket Australia following the investigation. Darren Lehmann subsequently stepped down from his head coaching position. It remains one of the most damaging controversies in Australian cricket history.
What is Cricket Australia's current stance on the renewed claims?
Cricket Australia reiterated confidence in its original integrity investigation, saying all relevant information had been properly considered. A spokesperson added that the governing body remained open to any new relevant information but stood by its existing findings.
Did Khawaja contact Lehmann before publishing his allegations?
No. Lehmann confirmed that Khawaja had not texted or called him before making the allegations public. Lehmann described the renewed scrutiny as emotionally difficult for himself and others directly involved in the 2018 episode, noting he had spent years trying to move past that period.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 41 min ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 4 weeks ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 10 months ago
  7. 11 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google