Did India Play a Role in Bangladesh's Independence? Madan Lal Discusses Violence Against Hindus
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In light of recent violence against Hindus in Bangladesh, former cricketer Madan Lal supports BCCI's decision to release Mustafizur Rahman from KKR. He stresses the need for reflection on India's historical role in Bangladesh's independence. This decision sparks debate on the intersection of sports and social issues.
Key Takeaways
- Madan Lal supports the BCCI's decision regarding Mustafizur Rahman.
- The decision comes in light of violence against Hindus in Bangladesh.
- Rahman was the most expensive Bangladeshi cricketer in IPL history.
- Public sentiment and historical ties played a significant role in the BCCI's decision.
- Criticism has emerged from several figures regarding KKR's choice.
New Delhi, Jan 3 (NationPress) Former Indian cricketer Madan Lal expressed his support for the Board of Control for Cricket in India’s (BCCI) decision to instruct IPL franchise Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) to release Bangladeshi cricketer Mustafizur Rahman. He emphasized that the officials are well aware of the circumstances and have likely made the correct decision following thorough consultations.
On Saturday, BCCI secretary Devajit Saikia announced that the board has advised KKR to release the fast bowler Rahman from their roster ahead of the IPL 2026 season, putting an end to weeks of speculation regarding the high-profile signing. This decision comes amid reports of violent acts against the Hindu community in Bangladesh in December, which sparked criticism regarding the pacer’s involvement in the IPL.
“I believe that the BCCI’s actions were taken after extensive consultations, considering public sentiment. They may have also received feedback from the government. I can’t judge if it’s right or wrong, but the BCCI has a deep understanding of the situation. India played a significant role in helping Bangladesh gain independence, and the violence against our Hindu brothers there is profoundly unacceptable. The citizens of Bangladesh must contemplate this,” Lal, a member of India’s 1983 World Cup-winning team, told IANS.
Rahman attracted significant attention when KKR acquired him for a record Rs 9.20 crore during the December mini-auction, making him the most expensive Bangladeshi cricketer in IPL history. He was signed after intense bidding between Chennai Super Kings and Delhi Capitals, starting from Rs 2 crore.
Currently, KKR has not released an official statement regarding the BCCI's directive, but compliance is expected ahead of the season's commencement.
Previously, spiritual leader Devkinandan Thakur, along with others, openly criticized KKR and its co-owner, Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan, for signing Rahman. Thakur noted that followers of Sanatan Dharma, specifically Hindus, were displeased with KKR's choice due to the ongoing atrocities against Hindus in the neighboring nation.
Point of View
It's imperative to recognize the complexities surrounding the involvement of sports figures in a global context. The actions taken by the BCCI indicate a proactive approach in addressing public sentiment and societal issues, aligning sports with national sentiments while maintaining a balanced view.
NationPress
04/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did BCCI ask KKR to release Mustafizur Rahman?
The BCCI's decision was influenced by recent violent incidents against the Hindu community in Bangladesh, reflecting public sentiment and concerns.
What was Madan Lal's stance on the BCCI's decision?
Madan Lal supported the BCCI's decision, stating it was made after thorough consultations and with an understanding of the situation.
How much was Mustafizur Rahman sold for in the IPL auction?
Mustafizur Rahman was acquired by KKR for a record Rs 9.20 crore, making him the most expensive Bangladeshi cricketer in IPL history.
Who criticized KKR for signing Rahman?
Spiritual leader Devkinandan Thakur and several others publicly criticized KKR and Shah Rukh Khan for their decision to sign Rahman amidst ongoing violence.
What implications does this situation have for the IPL?
This situation raises questions about the intersection of sports and social issues, potentially affecting team dynamics and public perception in the IPL.
