Why Did Selectors Choose Inglis Over Webster in the Ashes? Ponting Questions
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Former Australia captain Ricky Ponting expresses his confusion over the selectors' decision to favor Josh Inglis over Beau Webster during the Ashes series. He highlights Webster's abilities and form, suggesting that the selectors missed an opportunity. Can Webster now seize his chance at No. 5 in the lineup? Discover more about this selection debate.
Key Takeaways
- Ricky Ponting questions the selectors' decision to choose Josh Inglis over Beau Webster.
- Webster showed impressive form, scoring 71 and taking wickets in his recent Test.
- Selectors may have missed a chance to balance the team by excluding Webster.
- Ponting believes Webster deserves more opportunities in the lineup.
- Future selections must consider both data and player performance.
New Delhi, Jan 17 (NationPress) Former Australia captain Ricky Ponting has raised his eyebrows regarding the Ashes selection decisions, expressing confusion over the choice of Josh Inglis over Beau Webster during the series. Despite an impressive start to his Test career, which included a match-winning debut performance in last year’s Border-Gavaskar Trophy finale, Webster was not included in Australia’s starting XI for the Ashes opener in Perth, with fellow all-rounder Cameron Green taking his place at No. 6.
The 32-year-old was also overlooked for the subsequent Tests in Brisbane and Adelaide, as the selectors opted for reserve wicketkeeper Inglis, who managed scores of 23, 32, and 10 while batting at No. 7.
Webster eventually made his mark in the New Year’s Ashes Test at the SCG, scoring an unbeaten 71 and taking three wickets with his part-time off-spin.
“Initially, I was surprised by their decision to choose Inglis over Beau. I understand that selectors delve deeply into data for these choices. There must have been some statistical justification; perhaps Inglis had superior metrics. However, I honestly can’t comprehend their reasoning,” Ponting remarked on SEN Tassie.
Ponting emphasized that the decision was perplexing, particularly considering Webster’s form and potential to enhance the team’s balance. He felt the selectors missed a significant opportunity by not including him throughout the Ashes.
“I was taken aback, but every time Beau plays, he consistently makes a strong case for his inclusion. With Usman Khawaja absent, there’s now a chance for him at No. 5. I can’t envision a scenario where Travis Head doesn’t continue as an opener, so perhaps it’s Beau’s opportunity to seize that No. 5 position.
“He may not be the flashiest player, but he’s a competitor. He understands what needs to be done in various situations, whether with the ball or in the field. Moving forward, it will be challenging to exclude him,” Ponting added.
Recently, Webster expressed his “disappointment” at not being selected for the first four Tests of the Ashes series.
Point of View
It's essential to recognize the implications of team selection in high-stakes series like the Ashes. While selectors rely heavily on data, the human element and individual performance cannot be overlooked. Ponting's insights shed light on potential oversights, emphasizing the need for a balanced and strategic approach in future selections.
NationPress
17/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Beau Webster left out of the initial Ashes squad?
Selectors opted for Cameron Green over Webster for the first Test despite Webster's strong debut performance.
What did Ricky Ponting say about the selectors' decision?
Ponting expressed confusion, suggesting that the selectors may have overlooked Webster's form and potential.
How did Beau Webster perform in the New Year’s Ashes Test?
Webster scored an unbeaten 71 and took three wickets, showcasing his skills and value to the team.
What position might Webster have a chance at now?
With Usman Khawaja absent, there’s an opportunity for Webster to claim the No. 5 spot in the lineup.
How does Ponting view Webster's playing style?
Ponting acknowledges Webster as a competitor who understands game situations, even if he isn't the flashiest player.
