Sandpapergate resurfaces: ACA CEO Paul Marsh says 'no winners' as Khawaja claims all knew

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Sandpapergate resurfaces: ACA CEO Paul Marsh says 'no winners' as Khawaja claims all knew

Synopsis

Eight years after sandpapergate shook Australian cricket, Usman Khawaja's claim that 'all of us' knew — backed publicly by David Warner — has reignited a controversy Cricket Australia insists is closed. The ACA is calling for the vitriol to stop, but with a book, a video endorsement, and no official reinvestigation, the full truth may remain contested for years to come.

Key Takeaways

ACA CEO Paul Marsh said the body will not comment on individual accounts of sandpapergate and has contacted all players from the 2018 tour to offer support.
Usman Khawaja alleged ahead of his book release that 'all of us' in the Australian squad knew about the ball-tampering plan during the Cape Town Test in 2018 .
Khawaja also claimed the object was used during the preceding Test in Gqeberha (Port Elizabeth) , extending the alleged timeline.
David Warner publicly endorsed Khawaja's account, calling it '100% accurate'; Warner had served a one-year ban and a lifetime leadership ban, the latter reversed in 2024 .
Cricket Australia chief Todd Greenberg ruled out reopening the investigation, saying 'there's absolutely no benefit in going back.' Marsh called for the 'ongoing vitriol' against those involved to end, noting the personal and professional price paid has 'already been too great.'

Australian Cricketers' Association (ACA) CEO Paul Marsh has responded to the renewed controversy around the 2018 Cape Town sandpapergate, saying the ACA will not comment on individual accounts of what transpired, as former Australia opener Usman Khawaja alleged that the entire Australian team was aware of the ball-tampering scandal. Marsh's statement, issued on 10 November 2026, came as the affair returned to headlines ahead of Khawaja's book release.

What the ACA Said

Paul Marsh described the events of the 2018 South African tour as 'a low point for Australian cricket,' acknowledging that Steve Smith, David Warner, and Cameron Bancroft 'paid an enormous price for what happened — one that was greater than and, as the ACA said at the time, disproportionate to any precedent in the game.' Marsh stressed that those at the heart of the issue are entitled to share their experiences, just as others are equally entitled to put the episode behind them.

'Eight years on, it is understandable that those involved may have different recollections and perspectives of what took place,' Marsh said in the ACA statement. He called for the 'ongoing vitriol directed at those involved to come to an end,' adding that 'the price paid, both professionally and personally, has already been too great.'

Khawaja's Explosive Allegations

The scandal was reignited when Usman Khawaja, ahead of the release of his book on Tuesday, claimed that virtually the entire squad had prior knowledge of the plan. 'It was all of us. Not the batters, not the bowlers, not the staff. All of us,' Khawaja said, as quoted by the Sydney Morning Herald. He added that in an ideal world he would not want to be the one to speak out, but that he genuinely expected the truth to have emerged over the previous eight years.

Khawaja also claimed the Australian side had used the object during the preceding Test in Gqeberha (then known as Port Elizabeth), extending the alleged timeline of the incident beyond the Cape Town Test alone.

Warner Backs Khawaja's Account

David Warner, who served a one-year ban and a lifetime leadership ban from international and domestic cricket — the latter overturned in 2024 — threw his public support behind Khawaja in a video statement. 'Hi everyone, it's been eight years since I've spoken on this topic, and Uzzi, I throw my full support behind you... It's 100% accurate what you've said,' Warner said, adding that Khawaja had written down every detail from that day onward.

Cricket Australia Rules Out Reopening the Case

Cricket Australia (CA) has maintained it is 'comfortable with the findings of our integrity process.' CA chief Todd Greenberg, speaking to Sen Radio, ruled out any fresh investigation, stating 'there's absolutely no benefit in going back.' The position draws a sharp contrast with Khawaja's insistence that the full picture was never publicly acknowledged.

What Happens Next

With Khawaja's book now due for release and Warner's public endorsement amplifying the claims, pressure on Cricket Australia to revisit the matter may intensify — even as officials continue to resist it. The ACA has confirmed it has been in contact with all players from the 2018 tour to offer support, extending that offer to members' families as well. How the broader Australian cricketing public and international observers respond to the new disclosures will shape the narrative heading into the next Australian summer.

Point of View

Named allegations from a serving international cricketer backed on video by another — sets up a credibility problem that an integrity process is supposed to prevent. Khawaja is not an anonymous whistle-blower; he is a sitting Australian opener making claims that, if accurate, fundamentally alter the official record of who was culpable. The ACA's call for empathy is well-placed, but empathy and accountability are not mutually exclusive. The real question is whether Australian cricket's governance has the appetite to distinguish between re-litigating punishment and correcting the historical record — a distinction the current CA leadership appears unwilling to draw.
NationPress
10 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is sandpapergate and why is it back in the news?
Sandpapergate refers to the ball-tampering scandal during Australia's Test match against South Africa in Cape Town in March 2018, in which Cameron Bancroft was caught on camera using sandpaper to alter the condition of the ball. It is back in the news because Usman Khawaja, ahead of his book release, has alleged that the entire Australian squad — not just the three banned players — was aware of the plan.
What exactly did Usman Khawaja claim?
Khawaja claimed 'it was all of us' in a quote reported by the Sydney Morning Herald, alleging that the full Australian team had prior knowledge of the ball-tampering. He also alleged the object was used in the preceding Test in Gqeberha (then Port Elizabeth), widening the scope beyond Cape Town.
How has David Warner responded to Khawaja's claims?
Warner posted a video statement saying 'it's 100% accurate what you've said' and expressing full support for Khawaja. Warner was himself banned for one year and received a lifetime leadership ban after sandpapergate; the leadership ban was lifted in 2024.
Will Cricket Australia reopen the sandpapergate investigation?
Cricket Australia has ruled out any fresh investigation. CA chief Todd Greenberg told Sen Radio that 'there's absolutely no benefit in going back,' saying the board remains comfortable with the findings of its original integrity process.
What is the ACA's position on the renewed controversy?
The ACA said it will not comment on individual accounts of what happened, and has been in contact with all players from the 2018 tour to offer support. CEO Paul Marsh called for the 'ongoing vitriol' against those involved to stop, saying 'there are no winners in this issue' and that the price paid professionally and personally 'has already been too great.'
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 8 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. 2 days ago
  4. 2 days ago
  5. 3 days ago
  6. 3 days ago
  7. 3 days ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google