Trump backs FIFA's Infantino, warns of 'terrible mistake' amid UEFA revolt
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
US President Donald Trump has publicly endorsed FIFA president Gianni Infantino, cautioning the world football governing body that it would make a 'terrible mistake' if it considered removing the Swiss administrator, as opposition to his leadership reaches a new peak. Trump made his position clear on 11 August in a post on his Truth Social platform, praising Infantino for overseeing what he described as the most successful World Cup in history.
In his post, Trump wrote: 'FIFA would be making a terrible mistake if, for any reason, they even considered replacing President Gianni Infantino. He is fantastic, having just presided over the most successful World Cup, by four times, ever presented. If he is gone, it will never be as successful or profitable again! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DJT.'
The Confederations Strike Back
Trump's intervention arrives at a particularly turbulent moment for Infantino. UEFA, the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), and CONCACAF launched a coordinated broadside against the FIFA president on Monday, accusing him of 'deception' and of placing himself above the collective good of the sport. The three confederations stopped short of explicitly demanding his resignation but called for a fully independent investigation into the circumstances surrounding a now-abandoned proposal to sell a stake in the World Cup's commercial rights.
In a joint open letter to the football community, the confederations declared: 'Football's strength has always been its unity. We call for that unity to be honoured now, for leadership that serves football, not seeks to command it.'
They also criticised an emergency FIFA meeting held in Morocco last week, claiming only one elected official was present — a claim that has added to calls for greater institutional transparency within the governing body.
The Commercial Rights Dispute
At the heart of the crisis is Infantino's proposal to sell 20 per cent of the World Cup's commercial rights to private investors, a move aimed at raising approximately $4.2 billion. The plan drew fierce opposition, particularly from European football bodies, and was eventually withdrawn. UEFA, backed by AFC and CONCACAF, has since threatened to boycott FIFA tournaments unless it receives firm assurances that similar proposals will not be revived.
The three confederations described the episode as a 'profound failure of judgement' and called for a review conducted entirely outside FIFA's own structures.
Infantino's Support Base
Despite the pressure, Infantino retains considerable backing across world football. The Confederation of African Football (CAF) issued a statement on behalf of its 54 member associations in his support, while Mexico and several South American nations — including Argentina, Paraguay, Ecuador, and Bolivia — have also publicly aligned with him. According to reports, nearly 70 of FIFA's 211 member associations have indicated support for Infantino, though around a dozen have reportedly withdrawn earlier commitments or confirmed they will not vote for him.
FIFA itself has strongly defended its president, warning against what it described as a 'concerted and ongoing effort' to undermine his leadership, and insisting any challenge must follow the organisation's statutes and democratic procedures. The governing body has also rejected allegations concerning payments made by UEFA to a former employee during Infantino's tenure as UEFA general secretary. Infantino has denied any wrongdoing; FIFA has called the allegations baseless.
Political Dimension and What Comes Next
Norway Football Federation president Lise Klaveness, a long-standing critic of Infantino, called for his resignation last week, intensifying speculation over his position ahead of the upcoming FIFA presidential election. With Trump now entering the fray, the dispute has acquired a distinctly political dimension, raising questions about the extent to which geopolitical influence is shaping the future of global football governance. How the broader membership responds to both external pressure and Trump's endorsement is likely to define the next phase of this confrontation.