Why is the Awami League Denouncing Charges Against Hasina’s Son?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Awami League denounces the ICT's arrest warrant against Sajeeb Wazed.
- Allegations are considered politically motivated by the party.
- The ICT was created to address war crimes from the 1971 Liberation War.
- Concerns arise about the misuse of judicial power for political aims.
- The situation highlights significant political tensions in Bangladesh.
Dhaka, Dec 5 (NationPress) The Awami League of Bangladesh has strongly criticized the arrest warrant issued by the nation's so-called International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) against Sajeeb Wazed, the son of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The party noted that many citizens have already dismissed the tribunal as a "kangaroo court".
This response followed reports that the ICT had issued an arrest warrant on Thursday against Sajeeb Wazed, who previously served as the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Advisor to the Prime Minister. This action was taken after formal charges were filed against him concerning alleged crimes against humanity amid protests that erupted during an internet shutdown last July-August.
The Awami League labeled the allegations as “groundless, ludicrous, and politically motivated.” The party emphasized that the ICT was originally established in 1973 to prosecute war criminals linked to the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War, and it should only handle cases of war crimes.
In their statement, the party criticized interim Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus, asserting, “Yunus — a representative of illegal usurpers and anti-liberation forces — is weaponizing this Tribunal for political retribution.”
The Awami League further argued that Yunus is trying to undermine the legacy of Bangabandhu and the principles of the Liberation War, stating that this manipulation is evident to the citizens of Bangladesh.
The party reiterated that an arrest warrant should only be issued when there are credible allegations and preliminary evidence. They asserted that during the violent protests of July-August 2024, Sajeeb Wazed was out of the country, which is a widely recognized fact.
“He remains abroad, and given that the state's apparatus is dominated by militants and terrorists, he cannot realistically present himself in court. This case is purely driven by political motives, and the issuance of an arrest warrant represents a grave violation of human rights,” the party contended.
Additionally, they accused the “killer-fascist and public enemy” Yunus of orchestrating a scheme laden with false and illogical accusations against Sajeeb Wazed as part of an effort to render both Bangladesh and the Awami League leaderless.
In conclusion, the Awami League declared its commitment to resisting any “conspiracy against Bangladesh’s sovereignty, the spirit of the Liberation War, and democratic values.”