Are Democratic Norms in Bangladesh Eroding After Recent Rulings Against Sheikh Hasina and Her Family?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Human rights advocates are sounding alarms over the recent verdicts against former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her family in Bangladesh. They argue these rulings not only breach legal norms but also threaten the foundation of democracy in the nation. Is this a sign of deeper issues within the justice system?
Key Takeaways
- International condemnation of verdicts against Sheikh Hasina.
- Concerns about democratic backsliding in Bangladesh.
- Allegations of misuse of the justice system for political ends.
- Call for adherence to international fair trial standards.
- Urgent recommendations for abolishing the death penalty.
London, Dec 10 (NationPress) International human rights attorneys have sharply criticized the recent rulings from Bangladesh's judicial system against former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, a leading figure in the Awami League, and her relatives, asserting that these decisions do not adhere to established legal standards and signify a decline in democracy.
They caution that the judicial framework may be manipulated as a mechanism for political rivalry.
On November 17, Bangladesh’s International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) imposed a death sentence on Hasina after convicting her of crimes against humanity tied to events from last July.
Additionally, two of Hasina's senior aides were sentenced: former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal received a death penalty, while Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, a former Inspector General of Police who testified for the state, was given a five-year prison term.
The International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI), based in the UK, issued a statement on Tuesday asserting that executing someone following a trial that does not conform to international fair trial standards “would essentially constitute a summary execution and a blatant infringement of the right to life.”
“While seeking justice for human rights abuses is crucial, including concerning severe offenses committed during the past administration, the IBAHRI emphasizes that all legal processes must adhere to international fair trial safeguards and denounces the death penalty under any circumstances,” the statement noted.
It further indicated that the recent trials “appear to fall short of acknowledged legal protocols, signal a regression of democracy, and underscore a judicial system at risk of being exploited for political purposes.”
The IBAHRI highlighted that an international legal team representing Hasina has “pointed out issues with due process, such as the absence of formal charge notifications, denial of counsel of her choice, and dependence on a state-appointed attorney with whom she had no prior communication.”
Separately, on December 1, a court in Dhaka sentenced Hasina to five years in prison for irregularities concerning land allocations in the Purbachal New Town project.
Moreover, Hasina’s sister, Sheikh Rehana, received a seven-year sentence, while her niece, UK MP Tulip Siddiq, was sentenced to two years.
Mark Stephens, co-chair of IBAHRI, condemned the ruling, stating, “Reports of harassment and intimidation of defense lawyers in representing their clients, as evidenced in Tulip Siddiq’s situation, undermine the essence of a fair trial and jeopardize the rule of law in Bangladesh. Such actions represent a significant abuse of state power.”
He urged that the interim government led by Muhammad Yunus “must guarantee that legal professionals can operate safely and independently, ensuring a true commitment to justice rather than political vengeance.”
The institute called on Bangladesh's interim government to cease all executions, implement a formal moratorium on the death penalty, and pledge to its complete and permanent abolition.
Point of View
It's essential to recognize the gravity of the situation in Bangladesh. The recent verdicts against Sheikh Hasina and her family illustrate not only a concerning deviation from legal norms but also represent a broader issue of democratic integrity in the nation. It is imperative that we remain vigilant and advocate for a justice system that upholds fairness and equality.
NationPress
01/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the verdicts against Sheikh Hasina?
Sheikh Hasina received a death sentence from the International Crimes Tribunal for alleged crimes against humanity and a separate five-year sentence related to irregularities in land allocation.
Who else was convicted alongside Hasina?
Two of her senior aides were also sentenced; Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal received a death penalty, and Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun was given a five-year prison term.
What does the International Bar Association say about these trials?
The IBAHRI condemned the trials for not meeting international fair trial standards, suggesting that the imposition of the death penalty would be a violation of the right to life.
What are the implications of these rulings for Bangladesh's democracy?
Human rights lawyers warn that these verdicts indicate a regression in democratic norms and may signal the use of the justice system for political purposes.
What actions does the IBAHRI call for?
The IBAHRI urges the interim government to halt executions, impose a moratorium on the death penalty, and commit to its complete abolition.
