Why is Bihar Minister Defending Nitish Kumar Amid Controversy?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Bihar's Chief Minister Nitish Kumar faces mounting criticism after a controversial incident involving a female doctor's hijab removal. Minister Jama Khan defends him, claiming no ill intent. This incident has prompted political backlash and raised concerns about the doctor's safety. Discover the unfolding story behind this heated debate.
Key Takeaways
- Nitish Kumar faces backlash for removing a hijab.
- Minister Jama Khan defends his actions as paternal.
- The incident has sparked political controversy.
- Dr. Nusrat Parveen has left Bihar amid safety concerns.
- Public response reflects deeper cultural tensions.
Patna, Dec 17 (NationPress) The Chief Minister of Bihar, Nitish Kumar, is under significant scrutiny following an event where he removed the hijab of a female doctor during a public gathering.
In the midst of this uproar, Jama Khan, a cabinet minister in the Bihar government, has staunchly defended the Chief Minister, claiming that there was no ill intent behind the gesture.
Addressing the press, Jama Khan remarked, “Everyone is aware of Nitish Kumar. He serves every segment of society. The female doctor is akin to his daughter. Nitish Kumar acted as a father figure, showing his pride in the success of a daughter from the minority community under his administration.”
Khan further accused the opposition of unjustly politicizing the situation.
“Certain individuals in the opposition are making unfounded accusations against Nitish Kumar without justification,” he stated.
In response to claims of a threat allegedly made by a Pakistani gangster regarding the Chief Minister related to this incident, Jama Khan categorically dismissed it.
“This is India. People might issue threats, but they hold no significance. We are Indians, and we fear no one,” he declared.
The controversy ignited on December 15, when Nitish Kumar presented appointment letters to 1,283 AYUSH doctors at the Samvad Hall within the Chief Minister’s Secretariat.
Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary and Health Minister Mangal Pandey were also present during the event.
Following the incident, the Chief Minister has been criticized by various individuals, including film actress Rakhi Sawant.
Moreover, a woman has reportedly filed an FIR against Nitish Kumar at a police station in Lucknow.
In the face of this backlash, the involved female doctor, Dr. Nusrat Parveen, has temporarily departed from Bihar.
She has traveled to Kolkata to reside with her family, as per media reports.
Sources indicate she left the state a day after the event.
Dr. Nusrat Parveen, who had long aspired to become a doctor, is set to commence her government service on December 20.
However, the developments ensuing the controversy have raised alarms regarding her safety and well-being.
Point of View
This incident raises crucial questions about cultural sensitivity and political responsibility. While Minister Jama Khan emphasizes the Chief Minister's intentions, the public's reaction underscores the importance of respecting individual beliefs and identities. It is vital for leaders to navigate these situations with care, fostering a climate of understanding and respect.
NationPress
17/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What triggered the controversy involving Nitish Kumar?
The controversy began when Chief Minister Nitish Kumar removed the hijab of a female doctor during a public event, leading to widespread criticism and political backlash.
Who defended Nitish Kumar amid the criticism?
Jama Khan, a cabinet minister in the Bihar government, defended him, asserting that there was no ill intent behind the act.
What was the reaction from the opposition?
The opposition accused Nitish Kumar of inappropriate behavior and politicized the incident, claiming it reflects a lack of respect for cultural practices.
What has happened to Dr. Nusrat Parveen following the incident?
Dr. Nusrat Parveen has temporarily left Bihar for Kolkata to stay with her family due to safety concerns following the backlash.
What is the significance of this incident politically?
This incident highlights ongoing tensions regarding cultural respect in politics and raises questions about the responsibilities of public figures in sensitive situations.
