Did BJP Really Accuse Pawan Khera of Dual Voter IDs and Call Rahul Gandhi ‘Vote Chor’?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a surprising turn of events, the BJP has accused Congress leader Rahul Gandhi of shielding his party’s media head, Pawan Khera, who allegedly holds dual voter IDs. This claim raises serious questions about electoral integrity and highlights ongoing tensions between the two political factions. What does this mean for the upcoming elections?
Key Takeaways
- BJP accuses Congress leader of electoral fraud.
- Pawan Khera allegedly holds two voter IDs.
- Violation of the Representation of the People Act is at the center of the controversy.
- Concerns raised about electoral integrity ahead of elections.
- Rahul Gandhi faces pressure to respond to allegations.
New Delhi, Sep 2 (NationPress) The BJP has made a pointed accusation against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, claiming that his party’s media chief, Pawan Khera, is in possession of two Electoral Photo Identity Card (EPIC) numbers, which contravenes election regulations.
During a press briefing at the BJP headquarters in Delhi, national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari asserted that Khera holds voter IDs from two separate constituencies—XHC1992338 from Jangpura Assembly and SJE0755967 from Assembly Constituency 40—and called on Rahul Gandhi to respond.
“This constitutes a blatant breach of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which prohibits any individual from voting in more than one Assembly constituency,” Bhandari stated. “If Khera is indeed the real culprit, then Rahul Gandhi, who is protecting him, is the ‘Vote Chor’.
Bhandari posed five critical questions to Gandhi, inquiring whether he was aware of Khera’s supposed dual voter IDs and if he would denounce such actions.
He also accused the Gandhi-Vadra family of obstructing the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls to safeguard their alleged vote manipulation and claimed that the Congress party has a history of inconsistencies and infiltration.
In a striking comparison, Bhandari recalled that “just prior to the Bihar elections, multiple EPIC IDs belonging to Tejashwi Yadav were uncovered,” alleging that the Congress is now employing similar strategies. “Instead of denouncing fraud within his party, Rahul Gandhi labels the citizens of Bihar as counterfeit and thieves to distract from the issue,” he asserted.
The BJP spokesperson also questioned how Sonia Gandhi's name appeared on electoral rolls in 1980 when, according to him, she was not a citizen of India yet. “Rahul Gandhi and his accomplices in this scheme must apologize to the nation,” Bhandari insisted.
Shifting his focus to Gandhi’s recent public addresses, Bhandari remarked, “For days, the nation has been observing Rahul Gandhi accuse ordinary citizens of being fake and thieves. However, today’s evidence reveals that the true culprits are within his own party.”
Point of View
I observe this unfolding political drama with a commitment to impartiality. The allegations made by the BJP against Rahul Gandhi and Pawan Khera highlight significant concerns regarding electoral integrity. It is crucial for all political parties to uphold democratic principles and ensure fair practices in the electoral process.
NationPress
02/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the allegations against Pawan Khera?
The BJP has accused Pawan Khera of holding two voter IDs, which violates the Representation of the People Act.
How has Rahul Gandhi responded to these accusations?
As of now, Rahul Gandhi has not publicly responded to the allegations made by the BJP.
What does the Representation of the People Act say about voter IDs?
The Act prohibits individuals from voting in more than one constituency, making dual voter IDs illegal.
Why is this issue significant in the context of upcoming elections?
Allegations of electoral fraud can undermine public trust and affect voter turnout, making it a critical issue.
What are the potential consequences for Congress if these allegations are proven true?
If proven true, it could lead to significant legal ramifications and damage the party's reputation.
