Is It Disgraceful for Congress to Play Bangladesh’s National Anthem?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a politically charged atmosphere, Shiv Sena's Shaina NC has strongly criticized the Congress for playing Bangladesh’s national anthem at a meeting in Assam. This incident has stirred considerable controversy and raised questions about national identity and patriotism. Uncover the reactions and implications of this politically significant event.
Key Takeaways
- Shiv Sena's Shaina NC condemns Congress for playing Bangladesh's anthem.
- Incident raises questions about national identity and patriotism.
- SIR 2.0 aims to enhance democratic processes across India.
- Political backlash reflects the sensitivity of cultural respect.
- Reactions highlight the ongoing tensions in Indian politics.
Mumbai, Oct 29 (NationPress) Following the rendition of Bangladesh's national anthem, "Amar Sonar Bangla," during a Congress gathering in Assam's Karimganj district, Shiv Sena leader Shaina NC expressed her outrage on Wednesday, deeming the act as “disgraceful and shameful.”
This condemnation arose after a video capturing the event, allegedly from a Congress Seva Dal meeting in Sribhumi town, gained significant traction on social media, igniting political backlash. Numerous users took to social platforms to criticize the Congress party for this occurrence.
In an interview with IANS, Shaina NC remarked, “The Assam Congress played Bangladesh’s national anthem, and they even did it at Indira Bhavan. I think nothing could be more disgraceful or shameful than this. The national anthem represents our patriotism and nationalism. If anyone wants to sing another country’s national anthem here, they should leave India.”
Additionally, the Shiv Sena leader addressed the ongoing debate regarding the nationwide Special Intensive Revision (SIR) 2.0.
She asserted, “A nationwide SIR is extremely important for strengthening democracy. This exercise will cover 12 states, including Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Bihar, and several Union Territories, reaching nearly 51 crore voters, as announced by the Election Commission. This is not a small initiative. When Gyanesh Kumar made this announcement, it deserved everyone’s acceptance,” while speaking to IANS.
In response to comments made by Trinamool Congress (TMC) Minister Firhad Hakim, Shaina NC stated, “Who is this West Bengal minister Firhad Hakim, who says, ‘If the CAA is implemented, we’ll break your legs’? Perhaps he should understand that the people have already rejected him—and are now rejecting Mamata Banerjee as well. Whether it’s the CAA, NRC, or SIR, they can keep spreading false narratives, but we will continue doing our work.”
Just a day prior, Firhad Hakim issued a stark warning, menacing to “break the legs” of BJP leaders and Election Commission officials should the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) or SIR be enforced in West Bengal.
Point of View
It is vital to remain unbiased and rooted in national interests. The incident involving the Congress party raises significant questions about patriotism and national identity. While it is essential to respect cultural exchanges, one must prioritize the sentiments of the citizens and uphold national dignity in political discourse.
NationPress
29/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened at the Congress meeting in Assam?
During a recent Congress meeting in Assam’s Karimganj district, Bangladesh’s national anthem was played, which led to a significant backlash from political figures, particularly from Shiv Sena's Shaina NC.
Why did Shaina NC condemn the incident?
Shaina NC described the act as disgraceful and shameful, emphasizing that the national anthem is a representation of patriotism and nationalism.
What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) 2.0?
The SIR 2.0 is a nationwide initiative aimed at strengthening democracy by covering 12 states and reaching nearly 51 crore voters, as announced by the Election Commission.
What was the reaction to Firhad Hakim's comments?
Shaina NC responded critically to Firhad Hakim's threats regarding the CAA and SIR, asserting that the people have already rejected him and Mamata Banerjee.
What are the implications of this incident?
This incident highlights the sensitive nature of national identity in India's political landscape and raises questions about cultural respect and patriotism.
